yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Luc,
>Would it be beneficial for CohesiveFrictionalPM to follow the same rule
(use of ScGeom6D instead of ScGeom)?

The classes in mail title are not using S6D, they are still using the
good old ScGeom.
I've been looking at your code, it uses ScGeom functionalities
correctly. S6D would probably let you remove a few lines, but not so
much. initialOrientation1/2 could be removed from NormShearPhys (because
it would be in ScGeom6D). I'm not sure it is worth the effort, and it
would result in something very similar to
Law2_ScGeom6D_CohFrictPhys_CohesionMoment.

Law2_ScGeom6D_CohFrictPhys_CohesionMoment is in fact able to reproduce
CohesiveFrictionalPM, but it can do more. Namely, thanks to Chiara, it
is now possible to unload moment elasticaly if you want (in CFPM
plasticity is always reversible).

Cheers.

Bruno

> Thanks for your advice
>
>   Luc
>
> 2011/1/25 Jerome Duriez <duriez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:duriez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
>     (sorry for...)
>
>     r2676 gets rid of the use of FrictPhysTrans... for
>     NormalInelasticityPhys
>
>     Jerome
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
>     Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
>     <https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
>     More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


-- 
_______________
Bruno Chareyre
Associate Professor
ENSE³ - Grenoble INP
Lab. 3SR
BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France
Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21
Fax : +33 4 76 82 70 43
________________