ac100 team mailing list archive
-
ac100 team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01324
Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: tegra: implement slave mode
-
To:
Andrey Danin <danindrey@xxxxxxx>
-
From:
Marc Dietrich <marvin24@xxxxxx>
-
Date:
Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:40:29 +0100
-
Cc:
linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@xxxxxxxxx>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ac100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
In-reply-to:
<1422516022-27161-2-git-send-email-danindrey@mail.ru>
-
User-agent:
KMail/4.14.4 (Linux/3.18.3-1-desktop; KDE/4.14.4; x86_64; ; )
Hi Andrey,
first, thanks for accepting the challenge once more ;-)
The driver depends on I2C_SLAVE now, so you need to add this to Kconfig. The
amount of code (and additional overhead) is pretty small, so I think it's ok
to always enable it. Otherwise we would need lots of ifdefs.
Am Donnerstag, 29. Januar 2015, 10:20:20 schrieb Andrey Danin:
> Initialization code is based on NVEC driver.
>
> There is a HW bug in AP20 that was also mentioned in kernel sources
> for Toshiba AC100.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Danin <danindrey@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 131
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> index 28b87e6..cfc4e67 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> @@ -42,8 +42,15 @@
> #define I2C_SL_CNFG 0x020
> #define I2C_SL_CNFG_NACK (1<<1)
> #define I2C_SL_CNFG_NEWSL (1<<2)
> +#define I2C_SL_RCVD 0x024
> +#define I2C_SL_STATUS 0x028
> +#define I2C_SL_ST_IRQ (1<<3)
> +#define I2C_SL_ST_END_TRANS (1<<4)
> +#define I2C_SL_ST_RCVD (1<<2)
> +#define I2C_SL_ST_RNW (1<<1)
> #define I2C_SL_ADDR1 0x02c
> #define I2C_SL_ADDR2 0x030
> +#define I2C_SL_DELAY_COUNT 0x03c
> #define I2C_TX_FIFO 0x050
> #define I2C_RX_FIFO 0x054
> #define I2C_PACKET_TRANSFER_STATUS 0x058
> @@ -125,6 +132,8 @@ enum msg_end_type {
> * @clk_divisor_std_fast_mode: Clock divisor in standard/fast mode. It is
> * applicable if there is no fast clock source i.e. single clock
> * source.
> + * @slave_read_start_delay: Workaround for AP20 I2C Slave Controller bug.
> Delay + * before writing data byte into register I2C_SL_RCVD.
> */
>
> struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature {
> @@ -133,6 +142,7 @@ struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature {
> bool has_single_clk_source;
> int clk_divisor_hs_mode;
> int clk_divisor_std_fast_mode;
> + int slave_read_start_delay;
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -173,6 +183,7 @@ struct tegra_i2c_dev {
> int msg_read;
> u32 bus_clk_rate;
> bool is_suspended;
> + struct i2c_client *slave;
> };
>
> static void dvc_writel(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u32 val, unsigned
> long reg) @@ -398,6 +409,12 @@ static inline int
> tegra_i2c_clock_enable(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>
> static inline void tegra_i2c_clock_disable(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> {
> + if (i2c_dev->slave) {
> + dev_warn(i2c_dev->dev,
> + "i2c slave is registered, don't disable a clock\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
is this really required? What are the callers of clock_disable? I think it
would be ok to make master or slave operation exclusive for now. We have no
way to test this anyway. Maybe some flag which blocks master operation.
> clk_disable(i2c_dev->div_clk);
> if (!i2c_dev->hw->has_single_clk_source)
> clk_disable(i2c_dev->fast_clk);
> @@ -459,12 +476,84 @@ static int tegra_i2c_init(struct tegra_i2c_dev
> *i2c_dev) return err;
> }
>
> +static inline int is_ready(unsigned long status)
> +{
> + return status & I2C_SL_ST_IRQ;
> +}
is_slave_irq?
> +
> +static inline int is_write(unsigned long status)
> +{
> + return (status & I2C_SL_ST_RNW) == 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_read(unsigned long status)
> +{
> + return !is_write(status);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_trans_start(unsigned long status)
> +{
> + return status & I2C_SL_ST_RCVD;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int is_trans_end(unsigned long status)
> +{
> + return status & I2C_SL_ST_END_TRANS;
> +}
Following the rest of the files coding style, I think this helpers can be
moved to the caller itself.
> +
> +static bool tegra_i2c_slave_isr(int irq, struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> +{
> + unsigned long status;
> + u8 value;
> +
> + if (!i2c_dev->slave || !i2c_dev->slave->slave_cb)
> + return false;
> +
> + status = i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_SL_STATUS);
> + if (!is_ready(status))
> + return false;
> +
> + /* master sent stop */
> + if (is_trans_end(status)) {
> + i2c_slave_event(i2c_dev->slave, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, NULL);
> + if (!is_trans_start(status))
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + /* i2c master sends data to us */
> + if (is_write(status)) {
> + i2c_slave_event(i2c_dev->slave, I2C_SLAVE_REQ_WRITE_START,
> + NULL);
> + value = i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_SL_RCVD);
> + if (is_trans_start(status))
> + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, 0, I2C_SL_RCVD);
> + i2c_slave_event(i2c_dev->slave, I2C_SLAVE_REQ_WRITE_END,
> + &value);
> + }
> +
> + /* i2c master reads data from us */
> + if (is_read(status)) {
> + i2c_slave_event(i2c_dev->slave, I2C_SLAVE_REQ_READ_START,
> + &value);
> + if (is_trans_start(status)
> + && i2c_dev->hw->slave_read_start_delay)
> + udelay(i2c_dev->hw->slave_read_start_delay);
> + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, value, I2C_SL_RCVD);
> + i2c_slave_event(i2c_dev->slave, I2C_SLAVE_REQ_READ_END, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static irqreturn_t tegra_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> u32 status;
> const u32 status_err = I2C_INT_NO_ACK | I2C_INT_ARBITRATION_LOST;
> struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = dev_id;
>
> + if (tegra_i2c_slave_isr(irq, i2c_dev))
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +
> status = i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_INT_STATUS);
>
> if (status == 0) {
> @@ -660,9 +749,48 @@ static u32 tegra_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int tegra_reg_slave(struct i2c_client *slave)
> +{
> + struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = i2c_get_adapdata(slave->adapter);
> +
> + if (i2c_dev->slave)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + i2c_dev->slave = slave;
> +
> + tegra_i2c_clock_enable(i2c_dev);
> +
> + reset_control_assert(i2c_dev->rst);
> + udelay(2);
> + reset_control_deassert(i2c_dev->rst);
> +
> + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, I2C_SL_CNFG_NEWSL, I2C_SL_CNFG);
> + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, 0x1E, I2C_SL_DELAY_COUNT);
> +
> + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, slave->addr, I2C_SL_ADDR1);
> + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, 0, I2C_SL_ADDR2);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int tegra_unreg_slave(struct i2c_client *slave)
> +{
> + struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = i2c_get_adapdata(slave->adapter);
> +
> + WARN_ON(!i2c_dev->slave);
> +
> + i2c_writel(i2c_dev, 0, I2C_SL_CNFG);
> +
> + i2c_dev->slave = NULL;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct i2c_algorithm tegra_i2c_algo = {
> .master_xfer = tegra_i2c_xfer,
> .functionality = tegra_i2c_func,
> + .reg_slave = tegra_reg_slave,
> + .unreg_slave = tegra_unreg_slave,
> };
>
> static const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra20_i2c_hw = {
> @@ -671,6 +799,7 @@ static const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra20_i2c_hw
> = { .has_single_clk_source = false,
> .clk_divisor_hs_mode = 3,
> .clk_divisor_std_fast_mode = 0,
> + .slave_read_start_delay = 8,
> };
>
> static const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra30_i2c_hw = {
> @@ -679,6 +808,7 @@ static const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra30_i2c_hw
> = { .has_single_clk_source = false,
> .clk_divisor_hs_mode = 3,
> .clk_divisor_std_fast_mode = 0,
> + .slave_read_start_delay = 0,
> };
>
> static const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra114_i2c_hw = {
> @@ -687,6 +817,7 @@ static const struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature tegra114_i2c_hw
> = { .has_single_clk_source = true,
> .clk_divisor_hs_mode = 1,
> .clk_divisor_std_fast_mode = 0x19,
> + .slave_read_start_delay = 0,
> };
>
> /* Match table for of_platform binding */
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
References