arsenal-devel team mailing list archive

[Bryce Harrington <bryce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:33:13AM -0800, Brad Figg wrote:
> Bryce,
> 
> Nice thought. In my own but processing, i parse out just the key/value pairs
> where the key is 'dmi*'. I like your general solution, but am wondering if
> instead of calling them a very generic "properties" how about calling them
> "apport_properties" (or something like that)?

Actually, ultimately I'm thinking we can use this for enabling our
scripts to track state too.  It'd just need a mechanism to save back the
added/changed properties.  But reading is the logical first step.

Bryce