asbru-cm team mailing list archive
-
asbru-cm team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00102
[Bug 1861730] [NEW] [Package verification] Signatures or hashsums
Public bug reported:
Is there any way we can verify Debian packages consistency using
original maintainers signatures? I can't find any particular reason why
we should blindly trust packagecloud, as they are a third-party service
with their own GPG signatures that could be changed any time.
Alternatively to signatures, I would kindly ask you to at least publish
SHA hashsums of .deb (and other) files on the github releases page upon
each release, so we can compare them against the packages we download
from packagecloud.io
** Affects: asbru-cm
Importance: High
Assignee: Ásbrú Connection Manager Project (asbru-cm)
Status: In Progress
** Tags: gpg packaging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ásbrú
Connection Manager Project, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861730
Title:
[Package verification] Signatures or hashsums
Status in asbru-cm:
In Progress
Bug description:
Is there any way we can verify Debian packages consistency using
original maintainers signatures? I can't find any particular reason
why we should blindly trust packagecloud, as they are a third-party
service with their own GPG signatures that could be changed any time.
Alternatively to signatures, I would kindly ask you to at least
publish SHA hashsums of .deb (and other) files on the github releases
page upon each release, so we can compare them against the packages we
download from packagecloud.io
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/asbru-cm/+bug/1861730/+subscriptions
Follow ups