banking-addons-team team mailing list archive
-
banking-addons-team team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01243
Re: [Merge] lp:~akretion-team/banking-addons/70-sepa-trf-dd-updates into lp:banking-addons
@Stefan
Thanks for your very clear explaination about BIC and for the URL you provided. It is very clear for me now.
I made some test on the website of a French bank and read this interesting document which precisely deal with this topic (the doc is in French, sorry) :
http://universwiftnet.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/addendum-guides-utilisation-standard-iso20022-remises-ordres-sepa-v1-0.pdf
This document underline a small detail that I didn't catch when reading the guidelines of the EPC : in a credit transfer, for the creditor, you should not put the CreditorAgent block at all (but, in a direct debit, for the debtor, you should use the current implementation Financial Institution Identification > Other > Identification = NOTPROVIDED). I checked again in the guidelines of the EPC and it confirm this. So I have just modified my code to reflect this.
About the exception, you are right, my code is not as good as it should. I am not an expert in this, but i'll try to do better in a later commit.
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~akretion-team/banking-addons/70-sepa-trf-dd-updates/+merge/200019
Your team Banking Addons Core Editors is subscribed to branch lp:banking-addons.
References