bzr-windows team mailing list archive

[Alexander Belchenko <bialix@xxxxxxx>]

Adrian Wilkins пишет:
>>> - We should support installation in all releases from XP to 7, but not
>>> on anything older than that, like 2000 or 95.

Can somebody explains what's wrong with Windows 2000?

>>> - We should probably start making NTFS a requirement, since there are
>>> filesystem operations that only work on NTFS and not on FAT32 and
>>> older which we could benefit from. In a couple years we could drop
>>> support for XP and 2003 and start benefiting from the transactional
>>> filesystem support that exists in Vista and newer to make certain
>>> operations cheaper (this is already exposed in pywin32, AFAICT).
>> Are you serious? Really?
>> This sounds like a very BAD joke for me.
>>
> 
> FAT32 still gets used enough as a "transfer" filesystem on dual-boot
> systems to be popular.

How about USB flash disks?