c2c-oerpscenario team mailing list archive

[Antony Lesuisse <al@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes but this field comes from the task object itself and those values
make sense when gtd is not used. Once gtd is installed, i agree that
urgent and very urgent are less relevant but it's a minor issue. Some
tasks might use gtd and some others might not so i prefer not to change
it.

** Changed in: openobject-addons
       Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
Importance and urgence confusion in gtd module
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619721
You received this bug notification because you are a member of C2C
OERPScenario, which is subscribed to the OpenERP Project Group.

Status in OpenObject Addons Modules: Won't Fix

Bug description:
The object project.task.priority of the gtd module is disconcerting. Indeed, the gtd method must help user to determine task priority with two parameters: urgence AND importance.
So this ERP module sort task in a timebox to enhance most prior tasks.

Urgence should only be determine by the deadline of the task.
But, I think that for Importance item, there is a confusion. The items of importance field are: very low, low, medium, urgent and very urgent. According to me, they should be: very low, low, medium, important and very important. No?