c2c-oerpscenario team mailing list archive
-
c2c-oerpscenario team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #13232
[Bug 704492] Re: [TRUNK 4305] INVISIBLE AND REQUIRED ATTRS NOT EVALUATED
hello,
i checked and i confirm the bug: attrs aren't working well in the web client.
1st bug:
-open the form view of a product.
-there is currently attrs on the weight and volume (make it readonly if product is a service)
-open a service product in edit mode and change its type to stockable
=> the fields stay not editable
2nd bug:
-modify the attrs in order to make it invisible instead of readonly if product is a service
-open a stockable product and change its type to service
=> the field is hidden but the label is still visible
Thanks Serge for the bug report, but next time try not to abuse of capital letters !
Quentin
** Changed in: openobject-client-web
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: openobject-client-web
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of C2C
OERPScenario, which is subscribed to the OpenERP Project Group.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704492
Title:
[TRUNK 4305] INVISIBLE AND REQUIRED ATTRS NOT EVALUATED
Status in OpenObject Web Client:
Confirmed
Bug description:
SITUATION
a field date and a text field
TEXT fields need to be visible and required only if the date is 16
year old or less
ON NO EDIT MODE
DATE AGE > 16 YEAR : Field invisible BUT LABEL is visible (NOT OK LABEL NEED TO BE INVISIBLE TOO)
DATE AGE <= 16 YEAR : Field and label visible (OK)
ON EDIT MODE OPEN WITH DATE AGE <= 16
Field & Lable visible and required (OK)
CHANGE DATE AGE TO BE > 16
Field & Lable visible and required (NOT OK THAT NEED TO BE
INVISIBLE AND NOT REQUIRED)
ON EDIT MODE OPEN WITH AGE > 16
Field invisible, Lable visible, not required (NOT OK LABEL NEED TO BE INVISIBLE TOO)
CHANGE DATE AGE TO BE <= 16
Field invisible, Lable visible, not required (NOT OK Field NEED
TO BE INVISIBLE AND REQUIRED)
ATM i have no time to debug that, but that will work fine and previous version, can't remember de version number, but i know that worked fine, today we test and that no more worked.
I hope i'm clear in my explication. This is a major bug for me and
maybe for many other develloper, it's not normal then ATTRS is not re-
evaluate when value change.
References