← Back to team overview

c2c-oerpscenario team mailing list archive

[Bug 713116] Re: [V6.01] BIG ISSUE - Bank statement do not handle correctly partial payment

 

as far as i understand, you simply encoded wrongly the bank statement
and let -1116.47 as amount instead of -1000 (amount really paid, removed
from your bank account and written down on the paper bank statement you
received).

So, except if i missunderstood something, i think that there is no bug
at all here. I'm setting this bug as invalid.

Thanks for the contribution,
Quentin

** Changed in: openobject-addons
       Status: Confirmed => Invalid

** Changed in: openobject-addons/6.0
       Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of C2C
OERPScenario, which is subscribed to the OpenERP Project Group.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713116

Title:
  [V6.01] BIG ISSUE - Bank statement do not handle correctly partial
  payment

Status in OpenERP Modules (addons):
  Invalid
Status in OpenERP Addons 6.0 series:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  - create a supplier invoice for 1116.47
  - Import it in a new Accounting/Bank and Cash/bank statement (using import invoice button)

  1st problem: Col. Amount and Payment are wrongly named and used -
  Amount is the money you pay  and payment is, in fact, the invoice
  amount to be paid...

  - Now, let's say you pay 1000 and it the full payment (I want a write-
  off for 116.47). I guess you enter -1000 in col "amount" and go to col
  "payment" and press F2 to get in the payment voucher. There, you try
  again to paid only 1000, validate and the accounting entry you get is
  the other way around it should be:

  Entry posted : 
  Debit: Supplier debt (1000), Debit Adjustment (116.47), Ct Bank (1116.47)
  Entry expected :
  Debit: Supplier debt (1116.47), Credit Adjustment (116.47), Ct Bank (1000)

  Other consequence is that my bank statement is totally wrong because
  the system change my payment for -1116.47 instead of -1000

  This is a serious issue. Thanks for putting it in priority, guys.





References