c2c-oerpscenario team mailing list archive

[Bogdan Stanciu <bogdanovidiu.stanciu@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 23. 02. 11 12:04, Ferdinand @ Camptocamp wrote:
> Reason 
> For companies with fiscal-year != calendar year the prefix must not be  "%Y" as this would start create strange numbering
> Example 
> December
> INV-2010-399
> Jan
> INV-2011-400
> this is not legal in Austria
> for this we develop a module (to be published soon) which creates 
> INV-2010-400 even for invoices in January 2011
> for this we need to overwrite sequence.get_id and especially _process - which does not allow to pass any parameteres.
> so IMHO we have to copy all get_id related stuff in a new module, which works now - still to be tested
>
do you NEED to have '2010' in your number? why? taking it out leaves no
problem in the sequence, I think

maybe easier that creating a new module...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of C2C
OERPScenario, which is subscribed to the OpenERP Project Group.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719300

Title:
  [6.0] account - Account Journal sequence number does not respect
  fiscal year definition

Status in OpenERP Modules (addons):
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Definition - see attachment

  the next sequence number is taken from the parent instead of the year
  sequence

  hence creating gaps in the yearly numbers which is not legal here in
  Austria

  the numbering has to be gapless  for each fiscal year