c2c-oerpscenario team mailing list archive
-
c2c-oerpscenario team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #27838
Re: [Bug 804991] Re: Cant process picking in multi-company environment
There are lots of examples of this in the code. It was OK when things
weren't multicompany but it probably needs wider addressing and correcting
for 6.1. There are many related and reported bugs to this one. And the
thing in common is returning the first search result, when the user has
multicompany access and is working with a company that was not created
first.
As examples, Balance Sheet and P &L wizards return first entries, which
often mismatch periods, charts and fiscals if the user has access to more
than one company. The crazy thing is that the default functions for those
wizards all handle getting their defaults so differently that all the
defaults in my setup actually belong to 3 different companies.
What makes it harder, is that these default values (most often journals, and
periods, sometimes fiscal years), selection widgets all refer to entries
with the same name. e.g. period names are identical, journal names are
identical, journal codes are identical, fiscal years are identical making it
very very hard for the user to tell what is going on. In my module
account_account_extension_o4sb I rewrote many of those functions to return
sensible defaults, and also updated the configuration wizard to
differentiate on names for journals. I think the greek localisation module
has done other related improvements
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Eric Caudal - www.elico-corp.com <
eric.caudal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, the user is in the same company as the PO.
> It depends on the order in which you create the periods in database. for
> example: create first the periods for company A in the database (then B)
> and try to receive an incoming shipment for company B
> _get_periods gives you the first period id it finds in the table.
>
> Eric CAUDAL
> eric.caudal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:caudaleric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cell phone: + 86 186 2136 1670
>
> Elico Corp, Shanghai
> OpenERP Ready Partner
> http://www.elico-corp.com
>
>
> On 04/07/2011 04:44, Kevin McMenamin wrote:
> > I have tried on 6.0.02 and works fine - are you sure that the company
> > under user/preferences was the same as the PO you were receipting?
> >
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to OpenERP
> Addons.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804991
>
> Title:
> Cant process picking in multi-company environment
>
> Status in OpenERP Modules (addons):
> New
>
> Bug description:
> In 6.02
> With 2 companies A and B, 2 charts of account and 2 periods set, one for
> each company.
> Creating a purchase order and then I try to process the "incoming
> shipment".
> When click in "Process", then in subform in "Validate" I receive the
> following message:
> Error occurred while validating the field(s) company_id: Company must be
> same for its related account and period.
>
> This is due to the fact that no periods are passed in
> stock_partial_move.do_partial()
> And then in account._get_period(), all periods are returned and the first
> period is chosen instead of chosing the one corresponding to the user.
> Maybe change in _get_period()
> periods = self.pool.get('account.period').find(cr, uid)
> and add a filter according to the user
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-addons/+bug/804991/+subscriptions
>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of C2C
OERPScenario, which is subscribed to the OpenERP Project Group.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804991
Title:
Cant process picking in multi-company environment
Status in OpenERP Modules (addons):
New
Bug description:
In 6.02
With 2 companies A and B, 2 charts of account and 2 periods set, one for each company.
Creating a purchase order and then I try to process the "incoming shipment".
When click in "Process", then in subform in "Validate" I receive the following message:
Error occurred while validating the field(s) company_id: Company must be same for its related account and period.
This is due to the fact that no periods are passed in stock_partial_move.do_partial()
And then in account._get_period(), all periods are returned and the first period is chosen instead of chosing the one corresponding to the user.
Maybe change in _get_period()
periods = self.pool.get('account.period').find(cr, uid)
and add a filter according to the user
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-addons/+bug/804991/+subscriptions
Follow ups
References