c2c-oerpscenario team mailing list archive
-
c2c-oerpscenario team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #36187
Re: [Bug 882462] Re: [6.1 trunk] openerp-web addons visible in the GTK client modules list
On 02. 11. 11 07:37, Vishal Parmar(Open ERP) wrote:
> Hello Bogdan,
>
> Yes, I agree with you
>
> When you start server from terminal you can give the more then one path/ Parameter. if you give the web addons path in server parameter as
> ./openerp-server --addons=../openobject-addons/,../new_openerp-web/addons/
>
> after that update the module list then you can see the web-addons module
> in regular addons module list.
>
> I hope this will be help full.
>
> Thanks and waiting for your reply.
>
hello,
Yes indeed, this is what I tried to convey.
And what I was saying, is that in my opinion it is NOT a good thing to
have the 'web' modules there, as they are not regular modules, like
'account' or 'sales'. There is no point to have them there, unless there
is one, which I cannot see :-)
thank you,
b
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of C2C
OERPScenario, which is subscribed to OpenERP Project Group.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882462
Title:
[6.1 trunk] openerp-web addons visible in the GTK client modules list
Status in OpenERP GTK Client:
Incomplete
Bug description:
hello,
[using latest code]
while installing the openerp-web addons (actually copying them into a
folder, as the setup.py install does not seen to work) I received the
advice to add the additional folder path to the addons-path parameter
in the server config. That works great, now the server start with web
...
However, I noticed that in the GTK, now I have the 10 additional
modules listed. I find it at least confusing, as they are NOT to be
updated, installed, this way.
I suggest we should have a filter, a different parameter for the web
addons, or why not to make them work from inside the server addons
folder or from an egg...
Thank you!
Bogdan
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-client/+bug/882462/+subscriptions
References