cairo-dock-team team mailing list archive

[Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <657564@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

2011/2/21 Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Yes we understand why you do that (we guess that it's not only for the
> fun ;) ) but if it's harder for the user too, I think it's not a good
> solution.

Yes, I do not think that it is easy for all users to choose a package.

I think that the one where user can install all plugin is simple in the user
who does not understand what user should have chosen.

And the provides of this function is performed in cairo-dock-plug-ins.
However, all users may not be so.
the user read description of the packages well, and  who can understand
which plugin is included in which package installs a package by
oneself and will delete it.

The method that you suggest can support only the former.
With the present package, I come by both support.
Which intends for all users whether it is a good thing?

>
> As said Fabounet, we use the same architecture as many programs like
> Compiz but on Compiz there are not a package for each plugin.
>

Compiz does not depend on the CPU architecture.
I depend on the hardware which a CPU working.
Please BTS when Compiz is the architecture except IA32 and amd64, and
there is a problem.
I seem to work in most architecture now at least.
  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=compiz
#  Of course I think that there are many problems.

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro

-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Cairo-
Dock Team, which is subscribed to cairo-dock-plugins in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/657564

Title:
  Duplicated package with cairo-dock-plugins (coming from Debian)

Status in “cairo-dock-plug-ins” package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in “cairo-dock-plugins” package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in “cairo-dock-plug-ins” source package in Natty:
  In Progress
Status in “cairo-dock-plugins” source package in Natty:
  In Progress
Status in “cairo-dock-plugins” package in Debian:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: cairo-dock-plug-ins

  Hi,

  After syncing cairo-dock-plugin package from debian, we now have two
  time the same source in the archive. Please work with Debian to be
  able to merge the 2 packages, and have it only once.

  Thanks,
  Fabrice