canonical-partner-dev team mailing list archive

[Diggory <1132690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I disagree that dependency handling is to blame, but that's just my 2¢.
No idea about the other packages, but agree that handling things
uniformly makes sense.

By the way you may have misjudged the flashplugin-nonfree package: from
what I remember, it doesn't install flash directly, but has to be run
from the command-line to do so, and it probably asks the licence then.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
Partner Developers, which is subscribed to adobe-flashplugin in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132690

Title:
  adobe-flashplugin installs without license agreement

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1132690/+subscriptions