canonical-ubuntu-qa team mailing list archive
-
canonical-ubuntu-qa team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00677
[Bug 2021962] Re: F/xilinx and J/xilinx uses different keyword in /proc/device-tree/compatible
The device trees comes directly from the Xilinx kernel
(https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx) . It seems like in the focal
kernel the overlay for the KV260 SOM did not set a compatible string so
the it fell back to the compatible string defined by the baseboard
(zynqmp-smk-k26-revA.dts) . When a device tree for rev B of the board
was added the compatible string was added to the rev A device tree as
well.
The change was added here:
https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commit/70604467dc949d3b77eabaa1288365cb25b2ec23#diff-f19b970e083cc67c8063c7698b0bb6554d69d43190d355adc20945526eda5831
I agree with Masahiro that Jammy is correct. Since the device trees are
not in the kernel build and are provided by Xilinx I don't think this is
something we can backport to Focal.
** Changed in: linux-xilinx-zynqmp (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2021962
Title:
F/xilinx and J/xilinx uses different keyword in /proc/device-
tree/compatible
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
New
Status in linux-xilinx-zynqmp package in Ubuntu:
Won't Fix
Bug description:
While testing J/xilinx, I noticed that the keyword we use to grep from
/proc/device-tree/compatible has to be changed into kv26 instead of
k26 that we used for F/xilinx
J/xilinx:
$ cat /proc/device-tree/compatible
xlnx,zynqmp-sk-kv260-rev1xlnx,zynqmp-sk-kv260-revBxlnx,zynqmp-sk-kv260xlnx,zynqmp
F/xilinx:
$ cat /proc/device-tree/compatible
xlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26-rev1xlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26-revBxlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26-revAxlnx,zynqmp-smk-k26xlnx,zynqmp
From what I can found on the Internet, KV260 is "a vision application
development platform for Kria K26 SOMs (system-on-module)". But it's
better to let the kernel maintainer (Portia) to answer that if this
difference is expected.
Related change for tests:
https://code.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-team/+git/autotest-client-tests/+merge/443543
---
External link: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/PEL-439
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2021962/+subscriptions
References