canonical-ubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Anthony Wong <1975691@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

** Also affects: linux-oem-6.1 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: linux-oem-6.1 (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: linux-oem-6.1 (Ubuntu Focal)
       Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: linux-oem-6.1 (Ubuntu Kinetic)
       Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: linux-oem-6.1 (Ubuntu Jammy)
       Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: linux-oem-6.1 (Ubuntu Impish)
       Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975691

Title:
  Remove SAUCE patches from test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh in net of
  ubuntu_kernel_selftests

Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.14 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.17 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Focal:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Impish:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Impish:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Impish:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Impish:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Jammy:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Jammy:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.14 source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.17 source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-6.1 source package in Kinetic:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh should not be failing anymore with patches
  submitted to fix it in bug 1871015 (unless it's a kernel config
  related issue).

  With the regression-testing result hinting system available, we should
  remove the SAUCE patches that mark "underlay in a VRF" test failure as
  an expected failure to catch regressions in the future. This could
  reduce maintenance cost as well.

  [Fix]
  Revert the following patches:
  * UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Make test for VXLAN underlay in non-default VRF an expected failure
  * UBUNTU: SAUCE: selftests: net: Don't fail test_vxlan_under_vrf on xfail

  [Test]
  Patched test script tested with F/I/J/F-oem-5.14/J-oem-5.17. I have
  also modify the test case to fail it deliberately to verify this
  change, it works as expected.

  [Where problems could occur]
  Change limit to test cases, should not have any real impact to any
  kernel functions. We may see failures reported from this test in
  our SRU regression-testing report in the future, but it means we're
  doing the right thing.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1975691/+subscriptions