canonical-ubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

Thread
Date
[Bug 2019880] Re: ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on jammy/fips

To: canonical-ubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Roxana Nicolescu <2019880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:04:08 -0000
Reply-to: Bug 2019880 <2019880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-kernel-tests
       Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Roxana Nicolescu (roxanan)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
     Assignee: Roxana Nicolescu (roxanan) => Magali Lemes do Sacramento (magalilemes)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
       Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019880

Title:
  ubuntu_kernel_selftests:net:vrf-xfrm-tests.sh: 8 failed test cases on
  jammy/fips

Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
  Invalid
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  These failures happen on all supported architectures, when fips=1.
  When fips=0, all test cases pass. Results are shown below:

  make: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net'
  make --no-builtin-rules ARCH=x86 -C ../../../.. headers_install
  make[1]: Entering directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux'
    INSTALL ./usr/include
  make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux'
  TAP version 13
  1..1
  # selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh
  # 
  # No qdisc on VRF device
  # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy                                           [ OK ]
  # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy                                           [ OK ]
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address                             [FAIL]
  # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address                             [FAIL]
  # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector                         [ OK ]
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device                             [FAIL]
  # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device                             [FAIL]
  # 
  # netem qdisc on VRF device
  # TEST: IPv4 no xfrm policy                                           [ OK ]
  # TEST: IPv6 no xfrm policy                                           [ OK ]
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy based on address                             [FAIL]
  # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy based on address                             [FAIL]
  # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with VRF in selector                         [ OK ]
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # RTNETLINK answers: Function not implemented
  # TEST: IPv4 xfrm policy with xfrm device                             [FAIL]
  # TEST: IPv6 xfrm policy with xfrm device                             [FAIL]
  # 
  # Tests passed:   6
  # Tests failed:   8
  not ok 1 selftests: net: vrf-xfrm-tests.sh # exit=1
  make: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/src/linux/tools/testing/selftests/net'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2019880/+subscriptions