canonical-ubuntu-qa team mailing list archive
-
canonical-ubuntu-qa team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01859
[Bug 2031377] Re: test_082_stack_guard_kernel in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed with J-oem-6.5 (compressed modules)
Proposed fix in https://code.launchpad.net/~alexmurray/qa-regression-
testing/+git/qa-regression-testing/+merge/455095
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2031377
Title:
test_082_stack_guard_kernel in ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security failed with
J-oem-6.5 (compressed modules)
Status in QA Regression Testing:
New
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
New
Bug description:
Test failed with 6.5.0-1002.2.
Running 'python3 ./test-kernel-security.py -v KernelSecurityTest.test_082_stack_guard_kernel'
Running test: './test-kernel-security.py' distro: 'Ubuntu 22.04' kernel: '6.5.0-1002.2 (Ubuntu 6.5.0-1002.2-oem 6.5.0-rc4)' arch: 'amd64' init: 'systemd' uid: 0/0 SUDO_USER: 'ubuntu')
test_082_stack_guard_kernel (__main__.KernelSecurityTest)
Kernel stack guard ... FAIL
======================================================================
FAIL: test_082_stack_guard_kernel (__main__.KernelSecurityTest)
Kernel stack guard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/tmp/ubuntu_qrt_kernel_security/src/qa-regression-testing/scripts/./test-kernel-security.py", line 758, in test_082_stack_guard_kernel
self.assertTrue(module, 'Could not find a suitable kernel module to test')
AssertionError: '' is not true : Could not find a suitable kernel module to test
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 0.003s
FAILED (failures=1)
Here is the test case:
def test_082_stack_guard_kernel(self):
'''Kernel stack guard'''
expected = True
if not self.kernel_at_least('2.6.31'):
self._skipped("only Karmic and later")
expected = False
else:
if self.dpkg_arch in self.arm_archs and \
not self.kernel_at_least('2.6.35'):
self._skipped("not available on ARM before 10.10")
expected = False
if self.dpkg_arch in ['arm64'] and \
not self.kernel_at_least('4.4'):
self._skipped("not available on ARM64 before xenial")
expected = False
if self.lsb_release['Release'] == 9.10 and self.kernel_version.endswith('-ec2'):
self._skipped("ignored on Karmic EC2")
expected = False
if self.dpkg_arch in ['powerpc']:
self._skipped("not available on 32-bit powerpc")
expected = False
if self.dpkg_arch in ['ppc64', 'ppc64el'] and \
not self.kernel_at_least('4.20'):
self._skipped("not available on powerpc before disco")
expected = False
if self.dpkg_arch in ['s390x']:
self._skipped("not available on s390x")
expected = False
if self._get_config('MODULES') is None:
self.announce("cannot check, non-modular")
# Fall back to config test...
self.assertTrue(self._get_config('CC_STACKPROTECTOR'))
expected = False
module = ""
for m in ['fs/befs/befs.ko', 'crypto/tcrypt.ko', 'fs/cifs/cifs.ko',
'net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.ko',
'net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.ko']:
m = os.path.join('/lib/modules/%s/kernel/' % (self.kernel_version), m)
if os.path.exists(m):
module = m
break
if expected:
self.assertTrue(module, 'Could not find a suitable kernel module to test')
rc, out = testlib.cmd(['readelf', '-s', module])
if expected:
self.assertEqual(rc, 0, out)
self.assertEqual(expected, ' UND __stack_chk_fail\n' in out, '__stack_chk_fail missing from kernel (tested befs.ko)')
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qa-regression-testing/+bug/2031377/+subscriptions