canonical-ubuntu-qa team mailing list archive
-
canonical-ubuntu-qa team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04613
[Bug 2072319] Re: fanotify10 in ubuntu_ltp_syscalls failed with #24, #25, #27
And the test log on F-oracle-5.15.0-1061.67~20.04.1 for reference.
** Attachment added: "fanotify10-F-oracle-5.15.0-1061.67~20.04.1.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2072319/+attachment/5794874/+files/fanotify10-F-oracle-5.15.0-1061.67~20.04.1.log
** Summary changed:
- fanotify10 in ubuntu_ltp_syscalls failed with #24, #25, #27
+ fanotify10 in ubuntu_ltp_syscalls failed with #24, #25, #27 on F-oracle-5.15 BM.Standard2.52
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072319
Title:
fanotify10 in ubuntu_ltp_syscalls failed with #24, #25, #27 on
F-oracle-5.15 BM.Standard2.52
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
New
Bug description:
Issue found on Oracle BM.Standard2.52 with
F-oracle-5.15.0-1063.69~20.04.1 during SRU 2024.06.10 (passed with
J-oracle)
Test failed with sub-test #24, #25 and #27:
fanotify10.c:769: TINFO: Test #24: don't ignore mount events created on file with evicted ignore mark
fanotify10.c:510: TPASS: Found 0 ignore marks which is in expected range 0-0
fanotify10.c:510: TPASS: Found 0 ignore marks which is in expected range 0-0
fanotify10.c:510: TPASS: Found 0 ignore marks which is in expected range 0-0
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:839: TPASS: group 0 (8) got 16 events: mask 20 pid=30897
fanotify10.c:839: TPASS: group 1 (8) got 16 events: mask 20 pid=30897
fanotify10.c:839: TPASS: group 2 (8) got 16 events: mask 20 pid=30897
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 0 (4) with FAN_MARK_MOUNT got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 1 (4) with FAN_MARK_MOUNT got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 2 (4) with FAN_MARK_MOUNT got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 0 (0) with FAN_MARK_MOUNT got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 1 (0) with FAN_MARK_MOUNT got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 2 (0) with FAN_MARK_MOUNT got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 0 (e00) with FAN_MARK_MOUNT got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 1 (e00) with FAN_MARK_MOUNT got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 2 (e00) with FAN_MARK_MOUNT got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:672: TINFO: Umounting /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/mntpoint
fanotify10.c:673: TINFO: Umounting /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/fs_mnt
fanotify10.c:674: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop5 to /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/fs_mnt fstyp=ext2 flags=0
fanotify10.c:675: TINFO: Mounting fs_mnt to /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/mntpoint fstyp=none flags=1000
fanotify10.c:769: TINFO: Test #25: don't ignore fs events created on a file with evicted ignore mark
fanotify10.c:510: TPASS: Found 0 ignore marks which is in expected range 0-0
fanotify10.c:510: TPASS: Found 0 ignore marks which is in expected range 0-0
fanotify10.c:510: TPASS: Found 0 ignore marks which is in expected range 0-0
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:839: TPASS: group 0 (8) got 16 events: mask 20 pid=30902
fanotify10.c:839: TPASS: group 1 (8) got 16 events: mask 20 pid=30902
fanotify10.c:839: TPASS: group 2 (8) got 16 events: mask 20 pid=30902
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 0 (4) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 1 (4) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 2 (4) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 0 (0) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 1 (0) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 2 (0) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 0 (e00) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 1 (e00) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 2 (e00) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:672: TINFO: Umounting /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/mntpoint
fanotify10.c:673: TINFO: Umounting /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/fs_mnt
fanotify10.c:674: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop5 to /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/fs_mnt fstyp=ext2 flags=0
fanotify10.c:675: TINFO: Mounting fs_mnt to /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/mntpoint fstyp=none flags=1000
fanotify10.c:769: TINFO: Test #27: don't ignore fs events created inside a parent with evicted ignore mark
fanotify10.c:510: TPASS: Found 0 ignore marks which is in expected range 0-0
fanotify10.c:510: TPASS: Found 0 ignore marks which is in expected range 0-0
fanotify10.c:510: TPASS: Found 0 ignore marks which is in expected range 0-0
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:507: TFAIL: Found 16 ignore marks but at most 8 expected
fanotify10.c:839: TPASS: group 0 (8) got 16 events: mask 20 pid=30909
fanotify10.c:839: TPASS: group 1 (8) got 16 events: mask 20 pid=30909
fanotify10.c:839: TPASS: group 2 (8) got 16 events: mask 20 pid=30909
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 0 (4) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 1 (4) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 2 (4) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 0 (0) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 1 (0) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 2 (0) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 0 (e00) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 1 (e00) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:834: TFAIL: group 2 (e00) with FAN_MARK_FILESYSTEM got unexpected number of events (0 != 16)
fanotify10.c:672: TINFO: Umounting /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/mntpoint
fanotify10.c:673: TINFO: Umounting /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/fs_mnt
fanotify10.c:674: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop5 to /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/fs_mnt fstyp=ext2 flags=0
fanotify10.c:675: TINFO: Mounting fs_mnt to /tmp/ltp-QTLCo7xXcu/LTP_fanrbZCmn/mntpoint fstyp=none flags=1000
...
HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fixes:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=9bdda4e9cf2d
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2f02fd3fa13e
Summary:
passed 993
failed 54
broken 0
skipped 3
warnings 0
INFO: ltp-pan reported some tests FAIL
GuoqingJiang has confirmed that the commits mentioned by the test case
had already in the repo.
gjiang@laptop:~/canonical/kernel/ubuntu/focal/linux-oracle-5.15/linux-main$ git tag --contain 9bdda4e9cf2d|grep 1063|grep 5.15
Ubuntu-oracle-5.15-5.15.0-1063.69_20.04.1
gjiang@laptop:~/canonical/kernel/ubuntu/focal/linux-oracle-5.15/linux-main$ git tag --contain 2f02fd3fa13e|grep 1063|grep 5.15
Ubuntu-oracle-5.15-5.15.0-1063.69_20.04.1
Compared to the result in previous 2024.04.29 cycle (5.15.0-1061.67~20.04.1), sub-test #24 - #30 were skipped due to:
Test #24: don't ignore mount events created on file with evicted ignore mark
TCONF: FAN_MARK_EVICTABLE not supported in kernel?
TINFO: Test #25: don't ignore fs events created on a file with evicted ignore mark
TCONF: FAN_MARK_EVICTABLE not supported in kernel?
TINFO: Test #26: don't ignore mount events created inside a parent with evicted ignore mark
TCONF: FAN_MARK_EVICTABLE not supported in kernel?
TINFO: Test #27: don't ignore fs events created inside a parent with evicted ignore mark
TCONF: FAN_MARK_EVICTABLE not supported in kernel?
TINFO: Test #28: ignore events on subdir inside a parent watching subdirs
TCONF: flags FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD and FAN_ONDIR do not take effect with legacy FAN_MARK_IGNORED_MASK
TINFO: Test #29: don't ignore events on subdir inside a parent not watching children
TCONF: flags FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD and FAN_ONDIR do not take effect with legacy FAN_MARK_IGNORED_MASK
TINFO: Test #30: don't ignore events on subdir inside a parent watching non-dir children
TCONF: flags FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD and FAN_ONDIR do not take effect with legacy FAN_MARK_IGNORED_MASK
Also note that there was a similar issue for J-OEM-6.1, but the error
message is a bit different. See bug 2008189.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2072319/+subscriptions
References