canonical-ubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Skia <2083484@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This is known, and "expected" from the code.

The list of valid architectures is built dynamically here: https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/tree/charms/focal/autopkgtest-web/webcontrol/request/submit.py#n80
That means that while the database has never seen any `riscv64` test run, this architecture will continuously be treated as any random typo.
MP welcome if you want to improve the behavior, and I'll be happy to provide review and guidance :-)

** Changed in: auto-package-testing
       Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: auto-package-testing
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Canonical's Ubuntu QA, which is subscribed to Auto Package Testing.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083484

Title:
  Autopkgtest: "You submitted an invalid request: arch riscv64 not
  found."

Status in Auto Package Testing:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Submitting an autopkgtest request for a package in a PPA for which the
  riscv64 build was published, I got

  > You submitted an invalid request: arch riscv64 not found

  I was told on IRC on 2024-10-02:

  <RikMills> nteodosio: currently no autopkgtests are enababled on the
  infra for riscv64. they do not run. packages do not get blocked for
  the lack of them. so do not worry

  If that is the case the error message should say something like that.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/2083484/+subscriptions