canonical-ubuntu-qa team mailing list archive
-
canonical-ubuntu-qa team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05646
[Bug 2085649] [NEW] io_control01 test in ubuntu_ltp_controllers failed on amd64
Public bug reported:
In cycle 2024.09.30, the io_control01 test in ubuntu_ltp_controllers
failed on noble:linux-ibm-gt running on Testflinger with:
"io_control01.c:115: TFAIL: Expect: (wbytes=606720) >
(st_wbytes=630784)"
Log:
19:23:55 DEBUG| Persistent state client._record_indent now set to 2
19:23:55 DEBUG| Persistent state client.unexpected_reboot now set to ('ubuntu_ltp_controllers.io_control01', 'ubuntu_ltp_controllers.io_control01')
19:23:55 DEBUG| Waiting for pid 702784 for 4500 seconds
19:23:55 WARNI| System python is too old, crash handling disabled
19:23:56 ERROR| Exception escaping from test:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/test.py", line 411, in _exec
_call_test_function(self.execute, *p_args, **p_dargs)
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/test.py", line 823, in _call_test_function
return func(*args, **dargs)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/test.py", line 290, in execute
self._call_run_once(constraints, profile_only,
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/test.py", line 212, in _call_run_once
self.run_once(*args, **dargs)
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/tests/ubuntu_ltp_controllers/ubuntu_ltp_controllers.py", line 136, in run_once
print(utils.system_output(cmd, verbose=False))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/utils.py", line 1269, in system_output
out = run(command, timeout=timeout, ignore_status=ignore_status,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/utils.py", line 916, in run
raise error.CmdError(command, bg_job.result,
autotest.client.shared.error.CmdError: Command failed, rc=1, Command returned non-zero exit status
* Command:
/opt/ltp/runltp -f /tmp/target -q -C /dev/null -l /dev/null -T /dev/null
Exit status: 1
Duration: 0.7181665897369385
stdout:
Checking for required user/group ids
'root' user id and group found.
'nobody' user id and group found.
'bin' user id and group found.
'daemon' user id and group found.
Users group found.
Sys group found.
Required users/groups exist.
no big block device was specified on commandline.
Tests which require a big block device are disabled.
You can specify it with option -z
INFO: Test start time: Fri Oct 25 19:23:55 UTC 2024
COMMAND: /opt/ltp/bin/ltp-pan -q -e -S -a 702789 -n 702789 -f /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/alltests -l /dev/null -C /dev/null -T /dev/null
LOG File: /dev/null
FAILED COMMAND File: /dev/null
TCONF COMMAND File: /dev/null
Running tests.......
tst_tmpdir.c:316: TINFO: Using /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz as tmpdir (ext2/ext3/ext4 filesystem)
tst_device.c:96: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0'
tst_test.c:1860: TINFO: LTP version: 20240930
tst_test.c:1864: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.8.0-1014-ibm-gt #15-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Oct 18 16:47:06 UTC 2024 x86_64
tst_test.c:1703: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports ext2
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.ext2 does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports ext3
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.ext3 does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports ext4
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.ext4 does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports xfs
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.xfs does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports btrfs
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.btrfs does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports bcachefs
tst_supported_fs_types.c:57: TINFO: mkfs.bcachefs does not exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports vfat
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.vfat does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports exfat
tst_supported_fs_types.c:57: TINFO: mkfs.exfat does not exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:168: TINFO: Skipping tmpfs as requested by the test
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on ext2 ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext2 opts='' extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023)
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=ext2 flags=0
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=36864) > (st_rbytes=0)
io_control01.c:115: TPASS: Expect: (wbytes=36864) > (st_wbytes=0)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=7) > (st_rios=0)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=13) > (st_wios=0)
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on ext3 ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext3 opts='' extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023)
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=ext3 flags=0
io_control01.c:67: TINFO: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=65536) > (st_rbytes=36864)
io_control01.c:115: TPASS: Expect: (wbytes=53248) > (st_wbytes=36864)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=12) > (st_rios=7)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=17) > (st_wios=13)
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on ext4 ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext4 opts='' extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023)
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=ext4 flags=0
io_control01.c:67: TINFO: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=102400) > (st_rbytes=65536)
io_control01.c:115: TPASS: Expect: (wbytes=69632) > (st_wbytes=53248)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=18) > (st_rios=12)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=21) > (st_wios=17)
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on xfs ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with xfs opts='' extra opts=''
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=xfs flags=0
io_control01.c:67: TINFO: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=156160) > (st_rbytes=102400)
io_control01.c:115: TPASS: Expect: (wbytes=94720) > (st_wbytes=69632)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=27) > (st_rios=18)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=29) > (st_wios=21)
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on btrfs ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with btrfs opts='' extra opts=''
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=btrfs flags=0
io_control01.c:67: TINFO: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=172544) > (st_rbytes=156160)
io_control01.c:115: TPASS: Expect: (wbytes=389632) > (st_wbytes=94720)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=28) > (st_rios=27)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=57) > (st_wios=29)
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra opts=''
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=vfat flags=0
io_control01.c:67: TINFO: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=189440) > (st_rbytes=0)
io_control01.c:115: TFAIL: Expect: (wbytes=606720) > (st_wbytes=630784)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=30) > (st_rios=0)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=85) > (st_wios=8)
Summary:
passed 35
failed 1
broken 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
As Testflinger is a new cloud and metal and openstack didn't reproduce
the changes, we should continue to keep an eye on this.
** Affects: ubuntu-kernel-tests
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2085649
Title:
io_control01 test in ubuntu_ltp_controllers failed on amd64
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
New
Bug description:
In cycle 2024.09.30, the io_control01 test in ubuntu_ltp_controllers
failed on noble:linux-ibm-gt running on Testflinger with:
"io_control01.c:115: TFAIL: Expect: (wbytes=606720) >
(st_wbytes=630784)"
Log:
19:23:55 DEBUG| Persistent state client._record_indent now set to 2
19:23:55 DEBUG| Persistent state client.unexpected_reboot now set to ('ubuntu_ltp_controllers.io_control01', 'ubuntu_ltp_controllers.io_control01')
19:23:55 DEBUG| Waiting for pid 702784 for 4500 seconds
19:23:55 WARNI| System python is too old, crash handling disabled
19:23:56 ERROR| Exception escaping from test:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/test.py", line 411, in _exec
_call_test_function(self.execute, *p_args, **p_dargs)
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/test.py", line 823, in _call_test_function
return func(*args, **dargs)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/test.py", line 290, in execute
self._call_run_once(constraints, profile_only,
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/test.py", line 212, in _call_run_once
self.run_once(*args, **dargs)
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/tests/ubuntu_ltp_controllers/ubuntu_ltp_controllers.py", line 136, in run_once
print(utils.system_output(cmd, verbose=False))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/utils.py", line 1269, in system_output
out = run(command, timeout=timeout, ignore_status=ignore_status,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
File "/home/ubuntu/autotest/client/shared/utils.py", line 916, in run
raise error.CmdError(command, bg_job.result,
autotest.client.shared.error.CmdError: Command failed, rc=1, Command returned non-zero exit status
* Command:
/opt/ltp/runltp -f /tmp/target -q -C /dev/null -l /dev/null -T /dev/null
Exit status: 1
Duration: 0.7181665897369385
stdout:
Checking for required user/group ids
'root' user id and group found.
'nobody' user id and group found.
'bin' user id and group found.
'daemon' user id and group found.
Users group found.
Sys group found.
Required users/groups exist.
no big block device was specified on commandline.
Tests which require a big block device are disabled.
You can specify it with option -z
INFO: Test start time: Fri Oct 25 19:23:55 UTC 2024
COMMAND: /opt/ltp/bin/ltp-pan -q -e -S -a 702789 -n 702789 -f /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/alltests -l /dev/null -C /dev/null -T /dev/null
LOG File: /dev/null
FAILED COMMAND File: /dev/null
TCONF COMMAND File: /dev/null
Running tests.......
tst_tmpdir.c:316: TINFO: Using /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz as tmpdir (ext2/ext3/ext4 filesystem)
tst_device.c:96: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0'
tst_test.c:1860: TINFO: LTP version: 20240930
tst_test.c:1864: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.8.0-1014-ibm-gt #15-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Oct 18 16:47:06 UTC 2024 x86_64
tst_test.c:1703: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports ext2
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.ext2 does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports ext3
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.ext3 does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports ext4
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.ext4 does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports xfs
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.xfs does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports btrfs
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.btrfs does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports bcachefs
tst_supported_fs_types.c:57: TINFO: mkfs.bcachefs does not exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports vfat
tst_supported_fs_types.c:61: TINFO: mkfs.vfat does exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:96: TINFO: Kernel supports exfat
tst_supported_fs_types.c:57: TINFO: mkfs.exfat does not exist
tst_supported_fs_types.c:168: TINFO: Skipping tmpfs as requested by the test
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on ext2 ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext2 opts='' extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023)
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=ext2 flags=0
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=36864) > (st_rbytes=0)
io_control01.c:115: TPASS: Expect: (wbytes=36864) > (st_wbytes=0)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=7) > (st_rios=0)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=13) > (st_wios=0)
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on ext3 ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext3 opts='' extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023)
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=ext3 flags=0
io_control01.c:67: TINFO: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=65536) > (st_rbytes=36864)
io_control01.c:115: TPASS: Expect: (wbytes=53248) > (st_wbytes=36864)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=12) > (st_rios=7)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=17) > (st_wios=13)
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on ext4 ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with ext4 opts='' extra opts=''
mke2fs 1.47.0 (5-Feb-2023)
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=ext4 flags=0
io_control01.c:67: TINFO: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=102400) > (st_rbytes=65536)
io_control01.c:115: TPASS: Expect: (wbytes=69632) > (st_wbytes=53248)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=18) > (st_rios=12)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=21) > (st_wios=17)
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on xfs ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with xfs opts='' extra opts=''
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=xfs flags=0
io_control01.c:67: TINFO: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=156160) > (st_rbytes=102400)
io_control01.c:115: TPASS: Expect: (wbytes=94720) > (st_wbytes=69632)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=27) > (st_rios=18)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=29) > (st_wios=21)
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on btrfs ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with btrfs opts='' extra opts=''
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=btrfs flags=0
io_control01.c:67: TINFO: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=172544) > (st_rbytes=156160)
io_control01.c:115: TPASS: Expect: (wbytes=389632) > (st_wbytes=94720)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=28) > (st_rios=27)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=57) > (st_wios=29)
tst_test.c:1799: TINFO: === Testing on vfat ===
tst_test.c:1158: TINFO: Formatting /dev/loop0 with vfat opts='' extra opts=''
tst_test.c:1170: TINFO: Mounting /dev/loop0 to /tmp/ltp-gMZkGJeGWE/LTP_io_aA6doz/mnt fstyp=vfat flags=0
io_control01.c:67: TINFO: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:95: TPASS: Did some IO in the IO controller
io_control01.c:111: TPASS: Found 7:0 in io.stat
io_control01.c:112: TPASS: Expect: (rbytes=189440) > (st_rbytes=0)
io_control01.c:115: TFAIL: Expect: (wbytes=606720) > (st_wbytes=630784)
io_control01.c:118: TPASS: Expect: (rios=30) > (st_rios=0)
io_control01.c:121: TPASS: Expect: (wios=85) > (st_wios=8)
Summary:
passed 35
failed 1
broken 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
As Testflinger is a new cloud and metal and openstack didn't reproduce
the changes, we should continue to keep an eye on this.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2085649/+subscriptions
Follow ups