← Back to team overview

canonical-ubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Bug 2091368] Re: ubuntu_ltp_syscalls ioctl_loop06 Set block size succeed unexpectedly

 

** Description changed:

  Received this error for oracular:linux 6.11.0-12.13 (2024.10.28 cycle)
  on ppc64el and arm64 architectures.
+ 
+ This seems to be an issue upstream and we will be getting a fix for this:
+ https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAEemH2co6g0TCcj7vtG49yq8qhUfjJ83iCRBD6qiwVqGEG9=SA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
+ 
  
  Running tests.......
  tst_tmpdir.c:316: TINFO: Using /tmp/ltp-plXy5OxdNy/LTP_iocB0HMif as tmpdir (tmpfs filesystem)
  tst_test.c:1860: TINFO: LTP version: 20240930
  tst_test.c:1864: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.11.0-12-generic-64k #13-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Nov 21 23:34:14 UTC 2024 aarch64
  tst_test.c:1703: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s
  tst_device.c:96: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0'
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE with arg < 512
  ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size failed as expected: EINVAL (22)
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE with arg > PAGE_SIZE
  ioctl_loop06.c:59: TFAIL: Set block size succeed unexpectedly
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE with arg != power_of_2
  ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size failed as expected: EINVAL (22)
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_CONFIGURE with block_size < 512
  ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size failed as expected: EINVAL (22)
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_CONFIGURE with block_size > PAGE_SIZE
  ioctl_loop06.c:59: TFAIL: Set block size succeed unexpectedly
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_CONFIGURE with block_size != power_of_2
  ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size failed as expected: EINVAL (22)
  
  Summary:
  passed   4
  failed   2
  broken   0
  skipped  0
  warnings 0

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Oracular)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Canonical
Platform QA Team, which is subscribed to ubuntu-kernel-tests.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2091368

Title:
  ubuntu_ltp_syscalls ioctl_loop06 Set block size succeed unexpectedly

Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
  New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in linux source package in Oracular:
  New

Bug description:
  Received this error for oracular:linux 6.11.0-12.13 (2024.10.28 cycle)
  on ppc64el and arm64 architectures.

  This seems to be an issue upstream and we will be getting a fix for this:
  https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAEemH2co6g0TCcj7vtG49yq8qhUfjJ83iCRBD6qiwVqGEG9=SA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/

  
  Running tests.......
  tst_tmpdir.c:316: TINFO: Using /tmp/ltp-plXy5OxdNy/LTP_iocB0HMif as tmpdir (tmpfs filesystem)
  tst_test.c:1860: TINFO: LTP version: 20240930
  tst_test.c:1864: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.11.0-12-generic-64k #13-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Nov 21 23:34:14 UTC 2024 aarch64
  tst_test.c:1703: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 00m 30s
  tst_device.c:96: TINFO: Found free device 0 '/dev/loop0'
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE with arg < 512
  ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size failed as expected: EINVAL (22)
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE with arg > PAGE_SIZE
  ioctl_loop06.c:59: TFAIL: Set block size succeed unexpectedly
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_SET_BLOCK_SIZE with arg != power_of_2
  ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size failed as expected: EINVAL (22)
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_CONFIGURE with block_size < 512
  ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size failed as expected: EINVAL (22)
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_CONFIGURE with block_size > PAGE_SIZE
  ioctl_loop06.c:59: TFAIL: Set block size succeed unexpectedly
  ioctl_loop06.c:76: TINFO: Using LOOP_CONFIGURE with block_size != power_of_2
  ioctl_loop06.c:67: TPASS: Set block size failed as expected: EINVAL (22)

  Summary:
  passed   4
  failed   2
  broken   0
  skipped  0
  warnings 0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/2091368/+subscriptions



References