← Back to team overview

cf-charmers team mailing list archive

Re: SSO / Service Broker test failures

 

Matthew,

Thank you very much.  We still don't understand the role of those
clients, but that fixed our issue and we now have a fully passing
deployment of 175.

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Matthew Kocher <mkocher@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm not too familiar with those tests, but my first guess would be that
> there is a missing client in the UAA configuration. In the spiff generated
> bosh templates there is a 'servicesmgmt' client which is where I'd start
> looking first.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Cory Johns <cory.johns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> We're down to two tests failing in CATS, and would like to request
>> some assistance from our friends at Pivotal.
>>
>> The failures seem to stem from the same issue, specifically that
>> OAuth2 authorization against a service broker fail.  The specific
>> tests that are failing are:
>>
>> * SSO Lifecycle When a service broker is created [It] can perform an
>> operation on a user's behalf using sso
>> * SSO Lifecycle When a service broker is updated [It] can perform an
>> operation on a user's behalf using sso
>>
>> The test failure outputs can be found respectively at:
>>
>> * http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/8047028/
>> * http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/8046470/
>>
>> The tests both first fail on the shelpers.RequestScopes(...) lines,
>> with the requests to http://login.<domain>/oauth/authorize returning a
>> 401 response (at lines 311 and 363, respectively, in the test
>> outputs).
>>
>> (Note: The Expect checking around those calls is slightly flawed and
>> the tests continue further before ultimately failing.  Specifically,
>> in RequestScopes, authCode is pre-initialized to `initialized` so will
>> never be nil, and neither is the returned httpCode checked in the test
>> case to ensure the RequestScope call was successful.)
>>
>> We have a deployment up (of release 175) that we can give access to,
>> with the service brokers available to test against.  We would
>> appreciate any assistance that can be provided, as these are the only
>> tests we are missing from having a fully passing deployment.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cory
>>
>> --
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~cf-charmers
>> Post to     : cf-charmers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~cf-charmers
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


Follow ups

References