← Back to team overview

checkbox-dev team mailing list archive

Re: On backporting piglit to precise

 

We can drop Precise.


On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Ara Pulido <ara.pulido@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
>
> On 31/03/15 14:48, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> > Hey Ara
> >
> > In that case cdts won't run on precise (which I'm fine with) with the
> > new piglit stack.
> > If that's the agreement I'm happy to end the piglit story here.
>
> I don't think we need to keep maintaining CDTS for Precise, but I will
> let Chris have the last word.
>
> Chris, can you confirm with Chih and Stéphane that we are happy to not
> maintain CDTS for Precise?
>
> Thanks,
> Ara.
>
> >
> > Best regards
> > ZK
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Ara Pulido <ara.pulido@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 31/03/15 14:45, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote:
> >>> Hey
> >>>
> >>> I'm looking at backporting piglit to precise but I already hit a small
> >>> roadblock with waffle. Waffle, which is a library pigilt depends on,
> >>> requires cmake 2.8.11 to build. Precise ships with 2.8.7. Do we want
> >>> to invest my time in working through all of the dependencies to a
> >>> point where piglit builds and works on precise?
> >>
> >> No, we are not creating a lot of new projects with Precise (only those
> >> that the customer requires it, which is not very often), so we shouldn't
> >> invest time fixing precise.
> >>
> >> The only thing that we should maintain is the certification and SRU
> >> whitelists.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Ara.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> ZK
> >>>
>



-- 
Chris Gregan
Project Manager
Professional and Engineering Services
Canonical USA Inc.
cgregan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cgregan[irc.freenode.net]
W-781-761-9448

----
1024/8806032D
E70F 7391 6C78 9B9E 6461 1CC7 B168 E1E7 8806 032D

Follow ups

References