coapp-developers team mailing list archive
-
coapp-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00015
Re: Another kind of package
I'm new to the conversation, so I don't have quoted material -- apologies.
*Program Files\ hosting*
Starting with Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008, we have
virtualization that silently takes over and redirects (for appcompat
reasons) writes to the caller's virtual application store. With Windows
XP and Windows Server 2003 fading away, is hosting in Program Files\
really a problem? I think we can safely assume that users with this type
of virtualization turned off within the candidate OSes are super
advanced/asking for trouble and therefore shouldn't be considered in the
design process. It's impossible to please everyone.
*Directory structure*
I like Elizabeth's approach of dropping versions (e.g. 1.0, 1.1) into an
authoritative <vendor>\<app> folder. I'd imagine this is neater,
especially when dealing with faster updating applications (or lots of
installed applications).
/rafael
Follow ups