← Back to team overview

coapp-developers team mailing list archive

Re: Another kind of package

 

I'm new to the conversation, so I don't have quoted material -- apologies.

*Program Files\ hosting*
Starting with Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008, we have virtualization that silently takes over and redirects (for appcompat reasons) writes to the caller's virtual application store. With Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 fading away, is hosting in Program Files\ really a problem? I think we can safely assume that users with this type of virtualization turned off within the candidate OSes are super advanced/asking for trouble and therefore shouldn't be considered in the design process. It's impossible to please everyone.

*Directory structure*
I like Elizabeth's approach of dropping versions (e.g. 1.0, 1.1) into an authoritative <vendor>\<app> folder. I'd imagine this is neater, especially when dealing with faster updating applications (or lots of installed applications).

/rafael

Follow ups