coapp-developers team mailing list archive
-
coapp-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00174
Re: Thinking abotu testing CoApp's tools.
Hmm LP doesn't support that--their help quotes:
"If you're losing messages because of this problem, you need to educate your team members."
And points to
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
I have hard time arguing with that... it's actually the behavior that we use here at MS.
G
Garrett Serack | Open Source Software Developer | Microsoft Corporation
I don't make the software you use; I make the software you use better on Windows.
-----Original Message-----
From: Olaf van der Spek [mailto:olafvdspek@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:46 AM
To: Garrett Serack
Cc: Ritchie Annand; coapp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Thinking abotu testing CoApp's tools.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Garrett Serack <garretts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [recycling back to the list … make sure you use reply-all :) ]
Might be a good idea to setup the list such that this is the default (via reply-to header).
Olaf
References