← Back to team overview

coapp-developers team mailing list archive

Re: Idea: Providing a generic user interface for configuring applications

 

Now you've done pissed off Thunderbird. It thinks your last email was a
scam. Personally, I'm on the fence.

/rafael

On 4/22/2010 6:46 PM, Garrett Serack wrote:
>
> LOL
>
>  
>
> Well, I was thinking XML as a validate-able data format.  I didn't
> actually have a plan. .INI file?
>
>  
>
> I'd like to avoid the wizard concept... I think it's less convenient.
> Tabs, ok, wizard... yik
>
>  
>
> I figured if it supported JavaScript or something, there could a
> moderate level of customization without significant effort.
>
>  
>
> Plus, I think I'm going to have JavaScript embedded somewhere in here
> anyway (in the PGO automation tool); probably in the form of IronJS
> (http://github.com/fholm/IronJS)
>
>  
>
> G
>
>  
>
> *Garrett* *Serack* | Open Source Software Developer | *Microsoft
> Corporation *
>
> */I don't make the software you use; I make the software you use
> better on Windows./*
>
>  
>
> *From:* Ritchie Annand [mailto:wakarimasen@xxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:38 AM
> *To:* Garrett Serack
> *Cc:* coapp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* Re: [Coapp-developers] Idea: Providing a generic user
> interface for configuring applications
>
>  
>
> Wait, /WinForms/? :)
>
> What sort of configuration abilities are you looking for? Are you
> thinking more about a hierarchy of properties (akin to an XML file) or
> something a little more process-oriented (tasks/wizards)?
>
> If you're looking to have it like an XML sort of hierarchy, do the
> nodes need to be unique? Just asking, because I put together a
> Configuration framework piece a while back (no UI) and one of the
> issues was that if you wanted to support database or registry, then
> you had to avoid XML's ability to have multiple nodes of the same name.
>
> A mildly generic snap-in sounds like fun.
>
> What would the JavaScript be used for?
>
> --=- Ritchie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Garrett Serack <garretts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:45 am
> Subject: [Coapp-developers] Idea: Providing a generic user interface
> for configuring applications
> To: "coapp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> <coapp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > (this may be something we'll look at a few months down the road)
> >
> > CoApp conformant packages are can not interact with the user at
> > install time.
> >
> > However, after installation, a user will want to configure an
> > application, and perhaps there should be a simplified method to
> > building a common User Interface for configuring them, rather
> > than relying on users to edit text files manually, or play
> > around registry keys, etc.
> >
> > And, now that I think about it, it would help with remote
> > administration if it all hooked up like a mmc snapin.
> >
> > It appears that MMC 3.0 supports a .NET Winforms model for
> > building snapins. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-
> > us/library/ms692744%28v=VS.85%29.aspx
> > I've got a really cool idea percolating in my head... kindof a
> > mildly generic snapin that can expose simple configuration
> > concepts via an xml file (+Javascript?) so that app publishers
> > can leverage a very consistent UI for configuring everything.
> >
> > Plus, this makes it all easy to remotely configure CoApp-
> > installed applications on remote machines.
> >
> > [Description: fearthecowboy]<http://fearthecowboy.com/>
> >
> > Garrett Serack | Microsoft's Open Source Software Developer |
> > Microsoft Corporation
> > Office:(425)706-
> > 7939                                       email/messenger:
> garretts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:garretts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:garretts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx%3cmailto:garretts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > blog:
> > http://fearthecowboy.com<http://fearthecowboy.com/
> <http://fearthecowboy.com%3chttp:/fearthecowboy.com/>>                                     
> twitter: @fearthecowboy<http://twitter.com/fearthecowboy>
> >
> > I don't make the software you use; I make the software you use
> > better on Windows.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers
> Post to     : coapp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>   


References