coapp-developers team mailing list archive

[Philip Allison <mangobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Why would you want to?  That might sound flippant, but it's a serious
question.  If you're building a "proper" CoApp package, the
dependencies of which are also already CoApp packages, why would you
choose to forego automatically benefiting from (compatible) updates to
those dependencies?

There is a use case for creating a minimal, stand-alone version of a
particular package, bundling just what it needs into a deployable
image, but I can't remember what conclusions have been reached about
that.

On 1 October 2010 02:36, Lee Fisher <blibbet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about CoApp's support of libraries. The intro
> video called static libs 'evil', I'd disagree with, with responsible use.
> So, with SxS, and the Dyanmic=goodStatic=bad framing, will I be able to
> build a project that responsibly uses static libs, and leverage CoApp?
>
> Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers
> Post to     : coapp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>