← Back to team overview

coapp-developers team mailing list archive

Re: Website documentation progress


The "version" refers to the article version--when the document changes enough, and you want to dump the comment thread on that article, you can update the version in the header, and disqus thinks its a whole new page. :)

Maybe we could put the git version in the header, I wouldn't want that actually visible. 

From: Mateusz Łoskot [mateusz@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 4:55 AM
To: Garrett Serack
Cc: coapp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Website documentation progress

On 21 December 2011 01:46, Garrett Serack <garretts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've been feverishly trying to write documentation this week ... and at the
> same time enhancing the DocPad-powered cms engine that's powering the
> CoApp.org website.


The new coapp.org looks great!
AFAIU, the "Version:1.0" means version of CoApp, right?

Looking ahead, would it be a good idea/possible to have the Reference section
versioned according to CoApp versions?


Or such thing is irrelevant and it is expected users use always the latest
version of CoApp (what makes sense, of course)?

What you think about displaying last change banner in the footer of each page?
"Generated from coapp.org@be6a8cc"
Then it will be easy to find out who recently authored page, track problems,
reference fixes to mistakes, etc.

Best regards,
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Follow ups