coapp-developers team mailing list archive

[Adam Baxter <voltagex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 4 June 2013 01:02, Garrett Serack <garretts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I have no problem with that.
>
> Really, if we want to support an option, that ends up being a custom pivot
> for that library... and obviously multiplies the package size out
> considerably.
>
>
I'm probably misunderstanding how this works, but why can't libpng for
example, be an optional dependency for the SDL package?

It actually looks like Debian has the libraries set up as hard
dependencies: http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/libsdl-image1.2

--Adam