compiz team mailing list archive

1. compiz team
2. Mailing list archive
3. Messages by thread

Messages by thread

Messages sent to the compiz mailing list, ordered by thread from the newest to oldest.

• [Bug 708894] Re: compiz assert failure: *** glibc detected *** compiz: corrupted double-linked list: 0x091e57c0 ***, (continued)
  • [Bug 708894] Re: compiz assert failure: *** glibc detected *** compiz: corrupted double-linked list: 0x091e57c0 ***
    From: Alex Launi, 2011-03-29
• [Bug 709380] ThreadStacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 709380] Stacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 709380]
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 710601] Crash report cannot be processed
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 710601] ThreadStacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 710601] Stacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 710601]
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 711256] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 711231] ThreadStacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 711231] Stacktrace.txt
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 711231]
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 710184] Re: Divide by 0 (dy is 0) unity-window-decorator crashed with SIGFPE in _decor_blend_horz_border_picture()
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 711327] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate()
  From: kirsti drewsen, 2011-02-01
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 711327] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate()
  From: ks64, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 711327] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate()
  From: Ingo Gerth, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 711327] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate()
  From: Travis Watkins, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 711327] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in nux::IOpenGLFrameBufferObject::Deactivate()
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Michael Terry, 2011-02-01
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Ubuntu QA's Bug Bot, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Antono Vasiljev, 2011-02-07
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Antono Vasiljev, 2011-02-10
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: shishimaru, 2011-02-16
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: pdaemon, 2011-02-17
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Dmitry G., 2011-02-23
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2011-02-25
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-02-25
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-02-25
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Sebastien Bacher, 2011-03-02
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Brian Murray, 2011-03-10
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: vulfgar, 2011-03-21
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-03-28
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-03-30
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-03-30
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Gary M, 2011-03-31
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-04-01
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Jason, 2011-04-05
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: David Barth, 2011-04-06
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-04-07
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: SkyMan, 2011-04-08
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Loïc Molinari, 2011-04-08
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Loïc Molinari, 2011-04-08
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Loïc Molinari, 2011-04-09
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-04-11
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-04-11
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-04-11
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-04-11
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-04-11
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: hassan121, 2011-04-13
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-04-14
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Kate Stewart, 2011-04-18
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Loïc Molinari, 2011-04-18
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-04-19
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Geoffrey Pursell, 2011-04-20
• Re: [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: avignon, 2011-04-21
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Geoffrey Pursell, 2011-04-21
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: tekstr1der, 2011-04-21
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: David Barth, 2011-04-22
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Davide P., 2011-04-28
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Kate Stewart, 2011-04-28
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: hassan121, 2011-04-29
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Pete Stucke, 2011-05-01
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Pete Stucke, 2011-05-03
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Alf, 2011-05-16
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: David Barth, 2011-05-31
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-06-01
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Loïc Molinari, 2011-06-08
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: David Barth, 2011-06-08
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Ing. Forigua, 2011-08-14
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Tim Penhey, 2011-09-19
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Omer Akram, 2011-09-22
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Sam Spilsbury, 2011-09-29
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: Zafer Hamadeh, 2011-10-18
• [Bug 711231] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in __pthread_mutex_lock()
  From: dino99, 2013-05-10
• [Bug 711012] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in nux::IOpenGLAsmVertexShader::IOpenGLAsmVertexShader()
  From: Jeff Waugh, 2011-02-01
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 711012] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in nux::IOpenGLAsmVertexShader::IOpenGLAsmVertexShader()
  From: Jeff Waugh, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 705856] [NEW] ccsm crashed with TypeError in _Read(): value is of wrong type for this column(when opening animations)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-01-31
• [Bug 710797] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in g_atomic_int_get()
  From: Ye Myat Kaung, 2011-01-31
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 710797] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in g_atomic_int_get()
  From: Ubuntu QA's Bug Bot, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 710797] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in g_atomic_int_get()
  From: Qays Poonawala, 2011-03-13
• [Bug 710797] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in g_atomic_int_get()
  From: Telmo, 2011-03-25
• [Bug 710797] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in g_atomic_int_get()
  From: Alex Launi, 2011-08-19
• [Bug 710797] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in g_atomic_int_get()
  From: Qays Poonawala, 2011-10-09
• [Bug 710797] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in g_atomic_int_get()
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-12-08
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-01-31
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Brian Murray, 2011-01-31
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-02-02
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Andy Whitcroft, 2011-02-02
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Andy Whitcroft, 2011-02-02
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Andy Whitcroft, 2011-02-02
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Andy Whitcroft, 2011-02-02
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-02
• Re: [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-02-03
• Re: [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-02-03
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: elPraga, 2011-02-03
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-03
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Omer Akram, 2011-02-05
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: SolidSlash, 2011-02-05
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Neil J. Patel, 2011-02-07
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: gpothier, 2011-02-07
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Marco Biscaro, 2011-02-07
• Re: [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-02-07
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-02-08
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-02-08
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Nusret, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: David Barth, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: David Barth, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: SolidSlash, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Nusret, 2011-02-09
• Re: [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: elPraga, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: elPraga, 2011-02-09
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Bowmore, 2011-02-09
• Re: [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-02-10
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Mingming Ren, 2011-02-10
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-02-10
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-02-10
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-10
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-02-11
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Neil J. Patel, 2011-02-20
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Michael.Heimann, 2011-02-20
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: SolidSlash, 2011-02-20
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Michael.Heimann, 2011-02-20
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-20
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: SolidSlash, 2011-02-20
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Michael.Heimann, 2011-02-21
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Артём Попов, 2011-02-21
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-02-21
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Michael.Heimann, 2011-02-21
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-22
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Артём Попов, 2011-02-22
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-22
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-02-22
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Артём Попов, 2011-02-22
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-02-24
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Brian Murray, 2011-02-24
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, all viewport only (one ws though)
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-03-01
• [Bug 710601] Re: unity-window-decorator crashed with signal 7 in g_datalist_id_set_data_full()
  From: philinux, 2011-01-31
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 710601] Re: unity-window-decorator crashed with signal 7 in g_datalist_id_set_data_full()
  From: Ubuntu QA's Bug Bot, 2011-01-31
• [Bug 710588] Re: compiz assert failure: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Assertion `STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' failed.
  From: Omer Akram, 2011-01-31
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 710588] Re: compiz assert failure: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Assertion `STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' failed.
  From: Ubuntu QA's Bug Bot, 2011-01-31
• [Bug 710588] Re: compiz assert failure: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Assertion `STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' failed.
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-02
• [Bug 710588] Re: compiz assert failure: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Assertion `STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' failed.
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-02-03
• [Bug 710588] Re: compiz assert failure: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Assertion `STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' failed.
  From: Doug McMahon, 2011-02-06
• [Bug 710588] Re: compiz assert failure: compiz: nv50_pc_emit.c:863: emit_flop: Assertion `STYPE(i, 0) == 0x09' failed.
  From: Travis Watkins, 2011-02-07
• [Bug 709461] Re: semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, one viewport only
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-01-31
• [Bug 709461] [NEW] semi-random invisible window with x geometry on top layer possible, one viewport only
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-01-31
• [Bug 682781] Re: empathy buggy list vanish when opened twice using the indicator
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-01-31
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 682781] Re: empathy buggy list vanish when opened twice using the indicator
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-01-31
• [Bug 682781] Re: empathy buggy list vanish when opened twice using the indicator
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-01-31
• [Bug 682781] Re: empathy buggy list vanish when opened twice using the indicator
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-02-02
• [Bug 682781] [NEW] empathy buggy list vanish when opened twice using the indicator
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-01-31
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: Paul Sladen, 2011-01-31
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: David Barth, 2011-03-07
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: Duncan McGreggor, 2011-03-07
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: Jason Smith, 2011-03-11
• Re: [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: Sam "SmSpillaz" Spilsbury, 2011-03-11
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-03-22
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: David Barth, 2011-03-29
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-04-01
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-04-01
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-04-04
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: Ingo Gerth, 2011-04-07
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-04-07
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: MestreLion, 2011-11-25
• [Bug 175874] Re: Compiz switcher Alt-Tab order is not predictable - should maintain LIFO ordering in application switcher
  From: Steve White, 2013-05-01
• [Bug 83098] Re: Focus shouldn't change when taking screenshot
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2011-01-30
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 83098] Re: Focus shouldn't change when taking screenshot
  From: Bug Watch Updater, 2011-02-04
• [Bug 710075] Re: unity not starting auto...so typed unity in terminal...then desktop froze completely...sometimes unity starts but the bar at the top doesn't load...desktop freezes after about 2 seconds
  From: Glen D'souza, 2011-01-30
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 710075] Re: unity not starting auto...so typed unity in terminal...then desktop froze completely...sometimes unity starts but the bar at the top doesn't load...desktop freezes after about 2 seconds
  From: Ubuntu QA's Bug Bot, 2011-01-30
• [Bug 710075] Re: unity not starting auto...so typed unity in terminal...then desktop froze completely...sometimes unity starts but the bar at the top doesn't load...desktop freezes after about 2 seconds
  From: Michael Terry, 2011-02-01
• [Bug 709598] Re: unity-window-decorator crashed with SIGFPE in decor_blend_border_picture()
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-01-29
• [Bug 709444] Re: unity-window-decorator crashed with SIGFPE in decor_blend_border_picture()
  From: Apport retracing service, 2011-01-28
• [Bug 709380] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sn_monitor_context_ref()
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-01-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 709380] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sn_monitor_context_ref()
  From: Ubuntu QA's Bug Bot, 2011-01-29
• [Bug 709380] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sn_monitor_context_ref()
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-02-03
• [Bug 709380] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sn_monitor_context_ref()
  From: bingo1912, 2011-02-04
• [Bug 709380] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sn_monitor_context_ref()
  From: arslan, 2011-02-05
• [Bug 709380] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sn_monitor_context_ref()
  From: Fitoschido, 2011-02-06
• [Bug 709380] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sn_monitor_context_ref()
  From: Neil J. Patel, 2011-02-25
• [Bug 709380] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in sn_monitor_context_ref()
  From: thang Pham, 2011-08-20
• [Bug 708670] Re: Compiz gnome resize not-consistent/present in all directions
  From: Paul Sladen, 2011-01-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 708670] Re: Compiz gnome resize not-consistent/present in all directions
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-02-21
• [Bug 708670] Re: Compiz gnome resize not-consistent/present in all directions
  From: Omer Akram, 2011-03-29
• [Bug 709117] Re: package compiz-gnome 1:0.9.2.1+glibmainloop4-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/gconf/schemas/compiz-grid.schemas », qui appartient aussi au paquet compiz-fusion-plugins-extra 0.9.2.1-0ubuntu2
  From: Colin Watson, 2011-01-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 709117] Re: package compiz-gnome 1:0.9.2.1+glibmainloop4-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/gconf/schemas/compiz-grid.schemas », qui appartient aussi au paquet compiz-fusion-plugins-extra 0.9.2.1-0ubuntu2
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-01-28
• [Bug 709117] Re: package compiz-gnome 1:0.9.2.1+glibmainloop4-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/gconf/schemas/compiz-grid.schemas », qui appartient aussi au paquet compiz-fusion-plugins-extra 0.9.2.1-0ubuntu2
  From: alfe08, 2011-01-28
• [Bug 709117] [NEW] package compiz-gnome 1:0.9.2.1+glibmainloop4-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/gconf/schemas/compiz-grid.schemas », qui appartient aussi au paquet compiz-fusion-plugins-extra 0.9.2.1-0ubuntu2
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-01-28
• [Bug 702822] Re: Launcher should not overlap windows during "Scale"
  From: Didier Roche, 2011-01-28
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [Bug 702822] Re: Launcher should not overlap windows during "Scale"
  From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2011-01-28

 •  Take the tour  •  Read the guide  •  Help for mailing lists  

© 2004-2021 Canonical Ltd.  •  Terms of use  •  Data privacy  •  Contact Launchpad Support  •  Blog  •  Careers  •  System status