credativ team mailing list archive
-
credativ team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04713
[Bug 942876] Re: 6.0 reconciliation doesn't work
Hi Gregorz,
thank you for reporting this problem and suggesting a fix! Does this
problem occur with every matched transaction? In general, reconciliation
of matched transaction is known to work well, except that your
modification is in a recently modified part of the code. It may be this
recent modification that is at fault (http://bazaar.launchpad.net
/~banking-addons-team/banking-addons/6.0/revision/71).
Looking at your code, it registers the id of the generated
reconciliation on the move_info struct, separately from the move line.
The OpenERP reconciliation logic dictates that the id of the
reconciliation should also be available from the move_line itself, like
the original code retrieves it. However, we are aware of caching issues
with browse objects such as the move_line in this piece of the code. We
will need to refresh the browse record after having effectively written
its reconcile_id by creating the reconciliation object.
Thanks again,
Stefan.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Banking
Addons Team, which is the registrant for Banking Addons.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942876
Title:
6.0 reconciliation doesn't work
Status in Banking Addons:
New
Bug description:
I am not sure if you are interested to fix version 6.0. (In 6.1 I see
it is different concept)
I get with my own developed parser that import bank statement wizard
recognises remote_account and partner and even says that matched
statement line. I see that invoice account move is marked with created
reconciliation ID. But this reconciliation ID doesn't appear on bank
statement line and doesn't create full reconciliation after confirming
the bank statement.
I have changed some lines in bank_import.py wizard and it started to work.
Generally I added reconciliation ID directly from create method because it cannot be taken later until whole wizard finishes.
Exact line numbers can differ as I added some log entries to analyse
the code. I have changed lines with comment # GG. Another change is
at the end.
around line 79:
if partial:
retval.reconcile_id = reconcile_obj.create( # GG
cursor, uid, {
'type': 'auto',
'line_partial_ids': [(6, 0, [move_line.id])]
}
)
else:
if move_line.reconcile_partial_id:
partial_ids = [x.id for x in
move_line.reconcile_partial_id.line_partial_ids
]
reconcile_obj.write(
cursor, uid, move_line.reconcile_partial_id.id, {
'type': 'auto',
'line_id': [(6, 0, [move_line.id] + partial_ids)],
'line_partial_ids': [(6, 0, [])],
}
)
else:
retval.reconcile_id = reconcile_obj.create( # GG
cursor, uid, {
'type': 'auto',
'line_id': [(6, 0, [move_line.id])],
}
)
return retval
Another change around line 834 (again one change marked with # GG)
if move_info:
values.type = move_info.type
values.reconcile_id = (
move_info.reconcile_id or # GG
move_info.move_line.reconcile_id and
move_info.move_line.reconcile_id.id or
move_info.move_line.reconcile_partial_id and
move_info.move_line.reconcile_partial_id.id
)
values.partner_id = move_info.partner_id
values.partner_bank_id = move_info.partner_bank_id
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/banking-addons/+bug/942876/+subscriptions
References