cssoss team mailing list archive

[Kiran Murari <kiran.murari@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

11th Page - List of Tables

Anne's changes to the table format in Installation.xml has stopped the
table from building while generating the pdf. Hence, "List of Tables" is
empty. Rev 19 generates the table perfectly and populates the "List of
Tables". So, Installation.xml need to revert back to rev 19 (only table
specific changes)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of CSS OSS
Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Book.
Matching subscriptions: OpenStackBook
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998045

Title:
  Wording clarifications from the OpenStack mailing list

Status in OpenStack Book for Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  From http://www.mail-
  archive.com/openstack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg11423.html.

  Tried a few times to send this directly to Atul and the
  css.ossbo...@xxxxxxxxxxx address in the paper, but was getting
  rejected content for Atul's email destination and no such user for the
  css.ossbooks email. So, some feedback, mostly little things,
  wording/format/etc:

  
  11th Page - List of Tables - "This is a tutorial style beginner’s guide
  for OpenStackTM on Ubuntu 12.04, Precise Pangolin. The aim is to help
  the reader in setting up a minimal installation of OpenStack." doesn't
  seem like a list of tables.

  13th page, section 1.1 - since it is a beginners guide, a short sentence
  describing IaaS, PaaS and SaaS would be a good thing to include.

  
  13th page, section 1.2 - similar to previous, a short sentence
  describing what a Compute, Storage, Imaging, Identity and UI service
  are/do would be goodness.

  
  14th page - Perhaps a dialect thing but should it be "The diagram below"
  rather than "The below diagram?" Also, I would put the overall diagram
  before the Nova-specific one and then call them "Overall Architecture"

  and "Nova Architecture" respectively. Show the beginner the overall
  first before hitting him with the complex :)

  Also, in the overall diagram, should Glance be called "STORE" or should
  that be "IMAGE" to maintain consistency with previous discussion -
  someone seeing Glance:Store and Swift:Storage will wonder about the
  difference.

  15th page - section 1.2.1.2.2 - I think that should start with
  "OpenStack components communicate"

  section 1.2.1.2.3 - "Compute workers deal with the instance management
  life cycle..." and I might add "based on the scheduling algorithm used
  by nova-scheduler."

  Section 1.2.1.2.4 - security groups are mentioned without prior
  definition.

  16th page - section 1.2.1.2.6 - previously, it was said that OpenStack
  Nova provides EC2 apis and the native was mentioned just as an aside.
  Now though we read "The scheduler maps the nova-API calls to the ..." -
  what has become of EC2?

  section 1.2.2 - might it be worthwhile to include the "Swift" project
  name along with "Open Stack Object Store" in the second bullet item?

  22nd page - section 2.2.2 - should there be some sort of caveat about
  using IP addresses appropriate for the admin's specific situation?

  Section 2.2.3 - the NTP gods are quite adamant about configuring at
  least four sources of time. That allows the bad clock detection
  heuristics to operate even if one of the time sources is unavailable.

  "IP addresses of the servers are resolvable" sounds like asking for PTR
  records to go from IP to name, but I think you mean to verify that the
  names can be resolved to IPs no? Perhaps "Ensure that the hostnames can
  be resolved to their respective IP addresses. If they are not
  resolvable via DNS, you can add entries to the /etc/hosts file."

  Some discussion of how long it will take Server1 to get its time
  synchronized and so be willing to serve time to others is probably in order.

  27th page - it might be an artifact of document viewer, but it isn't
  possible to cut-and-paste the keystone commands from the document. And
  even if it was, where I'd expect to find a backslash '\' there is an
  arrow with a curled shaft - is that something bash et all will recognize
  and deal with properly as a "continued on the next line" indication?

  
  40th page - why is "Server2" a child of "Server1" section 2.2 instead of
  its own section 2.3? Also, the interfaces file seems to be the first
  indication that Server2 needs to have two NICs.

  42nd page - same sort of question about Client1

  56th page - 5.2.1 Instances - the text is on this page, but the image is
  on the 57th page. And that continues with the other sections.
  Something should be done to force the text and image to be on the same page.

  58th page - section 5.2.3 - Flavors as a term just sort of magically
  appears for the first time here.

  80th page - section 8.1 - not an issue with the document per-se but with
  the terms nova chose. To someone with much knowledge of TCP "From Port"
  sounds like the source port number and "To Port" sounds like the
  destination port number. That is very different from what they are in
  this context, which are the Beginning and Ending port numbers of an
  instance-local range of ports being opened. Some verbiage about that
  might be goodness.

  Also the example description for adding port 22 is incomplete - it isn't
  allowing tcp traffic traffic generally. It is allowing ssh/scp traffic
  specifically

  hope that helps,

  rick jones

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstackbook/+bug/998045/+subscriptions