cuneiform team mailing list archive

["Jussi Pakkanen" <jpakkane@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 3:13 PM, René Rebe <rene.rebe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> the attached patch allows compiling cuneiform on non-x86 platforms,
> however PUMA_Init fails, AFAICS reading some data file and probably some
> sanity checks failing due missing portable data file reads (such as
> endianess swaps).

Does someone know enough DOS/Windows programming to know why they are
calling the interrupt? Does it have some special side-effects? Could
we just get rid of it altogether and just use abort() everywhere?