curtin-dev team mailing list archive

[Dan Bungert <mp+443612@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> This is all fine of course but is there a reason we branched the 23.1 release branch off such an old point of master?

I had originally planned to use lunar as the starting point, and the f2fs stuff isn't quite right (tries too aggressively to pull in the f2fs tools package).  Also I needed to drop the gpt unicode name handling stuff, as it was causing chaos on later series and wasn't part of my origin plan.

So original momentum mostly, but yes reverting a few commits instead would probably have made more sense.
-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~dbungert/curtin/+git/curtin/+merge/443612
Your team curtin developers is subscribed to branch curtin:release/23.1.