debcrafters-packages team mailing list archive
-
debcrafters-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04057
[Bug 595934] Re: gvfs-backends should be split in multiple sub-packages
** Tags removed: lunar
** Tags added: questing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Debcrafters packages, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/595934
Title:
gvfs-backends should be split in multiple sub-packages
Status in gvfs package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in gvfs package in Debian:
New
Bug description:
Binary package hint: gvfs
The gvfs-backends should be transformed in a meta-package that only
recommends other more specific sub-packages.
Currently the gvfs-backends package contains «the afc, archive, burn,
cdda, dav, dnssd, ftp, gphoto2, http, network, obexftp, sftp,
smb and smb-browse backends» and depends on 22 different libraries.
While all these backends may come handy at times, low-resource
computer would benefit if some of these where not installed.
For example cd-less computers (not only netbooks) do not need the
"burn" or "cdda" backends. These two backends install and run a demon
that requires memory and installs unneeded libraries.
A similar argument applies to the AFS backend (not that much useful
these days to a wide audience, runs a daemon), gphoto2 (office
workstation and thin clients do not need it, runs a daemon), obexftp
(makes any Gnome installation dependent on Bluetooth libraries) and
any other protocol.
While installing all these backends by default is certainly a good
thing, not having a way to remove them when not needed is a problem.
Making gvfs-backends a meta-package and splitting its current content
in multiple packages (gvfs-backends-afs, gvfs-backends-sftp, gvfs-
backends-smb) would retain the good behaviour while still allowing
users with little resources (RAM, disk, CPU) to remove the unneeded
components.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/595934/+subscriptions