debcrafters-packages team mailing list archive

[Marvin Wenzel <2117696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the quick response!

We already use chroots for building i386 executables for old system
versions. Sadly, my experience is, that it doesn't easily integrate in
our development setup, but I'll have another look in this case.

In Ubuntu 22.04 building with the "delivered" multiarch packages works
like a charm, thats why I tried going the same way while moving to
24.04. To me it looks like a nice clean way, so why not use it ;-)

>From the package contents I actually thought it would be "only" (<-
please note the the high quotes ;-)) necessary to package the files in a
different way (together with MultiArch=same), but I understand that
other changes would be necessary -->  more unwanted effort.

Actually we originally only want to use libarchive-dev which added the
dependencies to libext2fs-dev in the version prepared for 24.04, so I
will try to find out, why they added it.

Thanks for your time!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Debcrafters packages, which is subscribed to e2fsprogs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2117696

Title:
  libext2fs-dev installation of ARM64 version in parallel to AMD64 not
  possible

Status in e2fsprogs package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I need to build software for both AMD and ARM on one system (build-server)
  Therefore i want to install the libext2fs-dev:amd64 and libext2fs-dev:arm64 in parallel.
  Via apt install this doesn't work  - it always wants to uninstall the other package

      sudo apt install libext2fs-dev:arm64
      ...
      The following packages will be REMOVED:
        libext2fs-dev

  I also cannot use e.g. libarchive-dev:arm64, because it depends on
  libext2fs-dev

  Diff of the data in the two packages (libext2fs-
  dev_1.47.0-2.4~exp1ubuntu4.1_amd64.deb vs libext2fs-
  dev_1.47.0-2.4~exp1ubuntu4.1_arm64.deb) shows no reason for this:
  (headers are the same, binaries are in architecture-specific folders)

      sudo diff --brief -sr  ext2fs-dev-amd64/data ext2fs-dev-arm64/data
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/e2p/e2p.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/e2p/e2p.h are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/bitops.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/bitops.h are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_err.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_err.h are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_ext_attr.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_ext_attr.h are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_fs.h are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2fs.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2fs.h are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_io.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_io.h are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_types.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext2_types.h are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext3_extents.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/ext3_extents.h are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/hashmap.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/hashmap.h are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/qcow2.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/qcow2.h are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/tdb.h and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/include/ext2fs/tdb.h are identical
      Only in ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/lib: aarch64-linux-gnu
      Only in ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/lib: x86_64-linux-gnu
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/share/doc/libext2fs2/html-info/libext2fs.html and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/share/doc/libext2fs2/html-info/libext2fs.html are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/share/doc/libext2fs2/libext2fs.texi.gz and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/share/doc/libext2fs2/libext2fs.texi.gz are identical
      ...
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/share/doc/libext2fs-dev/copyright and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/share/doc/libext2fs-dev/copyright are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/share/doc-base/libext2fs-dev.libext2fs and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/share/doc-base/libext2fs-dev.libext2fs are identical
      Files ext2fs-dev-amd64/data/usr/share/info/libext2fs.info.gz and ext2fs-dev-arm64/data/usr/share/info/libext2fs.info.gz are identical

  Thank you!

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
  Package: libext2fs-dev 1.47.0-2.4~exp1ubuntu4.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.14.0-24.24~24.04.3-generic 6.14.6
  Uname: Linux 6.14.0-24-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.8
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Jul 23 13:30:07 2025
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2025-07-23 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20250215)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   SHELL=/bin/bash
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
  RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
  SourcePackage: e2fsprogs
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/2117696/+subscriptions