debcrafters-packages team mailing list archive

[Simon Chopin <2121039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

As usual, turns out not to be a glibc regression so much as the user
code relying on UB, which finally blew up.

https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/6291

** Also affects: flatpak (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: flatpak (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
       Status: Triaged => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Debcrafters packages, which is subscribed to glibc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2121039

Title:
  flatpak:ppc64el fails vs glibc 2.42

Status in flatpak package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in glibc package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  Full logs:

  https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
  questing/questing/ppc64el/f/flatpak/20250819_121950_1daa2@/log.gz#S9

  Excerpt:

  1612s not ok /library/install-launch-uninstall - flatpak-FATAL-ERROR: fcntl F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC: Invalid argument
  1612s Bail out!
  1612s cleaning up pid 67759
  1612s FAIL: Flatpak/testlibrary.test (Child process killed by signal 5)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/2121039/+subscriptions