debcrafters-packages team mailing list archive

[Joao Andre Simioni <2123886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

[Impact]

When running "lscpu" on a Vera-based system, it doesn't report a model
name:

Vendor ID: ARM
Model: 0

[Fix]

Adding the additional arm_part to sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c solves the
problem. The commit below adds the specific codes missing from Noble's
(and previous) versions.

https://github.com/util-linux/util-
linux/commit/908777470d403ec30c525472ba0d3701c9c5a223

[Test Steps]

* Verify whether output of lscpu is correct on new CPUs; eg:
Vendor ID: ARM
Model name: Olympus

* Verify whether output of lscpu doesn't change on old CPUs; eg:
Vendor ID: ARM
Model name: Neoverse-N1

[What Could Go Wrong]

The fix only introduces additional model identifiers to match
against and print a model name string, thus regression impact
should be contained within lscpu and printing cpus model name
on ARM systems.

Output doesn't change on systems with non-affected CPU models.

** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Noble)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Plucky)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Questing)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New

** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Plucky)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Also affects: util-linux (Ubuntu Questing)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Debcrafters packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2123886

Title:
  Add missing ARM-cores to support Vera-based systems

Status in util-linux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in util-linux source package in Noble:
  New
Status in util-linux source package in Plucky:
  New
Status in util-linux source package in Questing:
  New

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  When running "lscpu" on a Vera-based system, it doesn't report a model
  name:

  Vendor ID: ARM
  Model: 0

  [Fix]

  Adding the additional arm_part to sys-utils/lscpu-arm.c solves the
  problem. The commit below adds the specific codes missing from Noble's
  (and previous) versions.

  https://github.com/util-linux/util-
  linux/commit/908777470d403ec30c525472ba0d3701c9c5a223

  [Test Steps]

  * Verify whether output of lscpu is correct on new CPUs; eg:
  Vendor ID: ARM
  Model name: Olympus

  * Verify whether output of lscpu doesn't change on old CPUs; eg:
  Vendor ID: ARM
  Model name: Neoverse-N1

  [What Could Go Wrong]

  The fix only introduces additional model identifiers to match
  against and print a model name string, thus regression impact
  should be contained within lscpu and printing cpus model name
  on ARM systems.

  Output doesn't change on systems with non-affected CPU models.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/2123886/+subscriptions