desktop-packages team mailing list archive
-
desktop-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00003
[Bug 812268] Re: doesn't display body for some GPG-signed emails
is that still an issue? it seems to work there with 3.1.4
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/812268
Title:
doesn't display body for some GPG-signed emails
Status in “evolution” package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Bug description:
Newer versions of evolution have stopped displaying the body for some
emails that are GPG-signed. Here is an example of the source of such a
problematic email:
Return-Path: <bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Received: from lists.samba.org (fn.samba.org [216.83.154.106]) by
mxdrop150.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6ICBbGm053346 for
<vernooi1@xxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:11:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix) id CA5F1AC287; Mon, 18 Jul 2011
06:11:37 -0600 (MDT)
Delivered-To: jelmer@xxxxxxxxx
Received: from adelie.canonical.com (adelie.canonical.com [91.189.90.139])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7A8AC336 for
<jelmer@xxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 06:11:29 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from loganberry.canonical.com ([91.189.90.37]) by
adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 #1 (Debian)) id 1QimfW-00044W-Gt
for <jelmer@xxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:11:26 +0000
Received: from loganberry.canonical.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
loganberry.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBDC2EAB3F for
<jelmer@xxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:11:26 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Launchpad-Message-Rationale: Reviewer
X-Launchpad-Notification-Type: code-review
X-Launchpad-Branch: ~baztian/bzr/809901-filter
In-Reply-To: <CAA-CaOV=g6+-wNFFPCMVxxLL_C5pJUp3A9+t=MqaUHX75t+2TA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: mp+67845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-Id: <4E2421AE.1070208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-Launchpad-Project: bzr
To: mp+67845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: John A Meinel <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Merge] lp:~baztian/bzr/809901-filter into lp:bzr
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:11:26 -0000
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Errors-To: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com); Revision="13405";
Instance="initZopeless config overlay"
X-Launchpad-Hash: dd9b49a01fb2ca7fb6a076b879016ccdcf1e52e8
X-XS4ALL-DNSBL-Checked: mxdrop150.xs4all.nl checked 216.83.154.106 against
DNS blacklists
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=0zc6fmG9YcuPB4Yp6G+9JUp7sX0X0uIJmZE+jPYAbEE= c=1
sm=0 a=bf2lbYCmWCMA:10 a=V5BiAS5A5MUA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10
a=obc2vuLeljtJ8xX1QGp5zg==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=danhDmx_AAAA:8
a=xe8BsctaAAAA:8 a=T7S0KEHCzfaTa4oP_cwA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=obc2vuLeljtJ8xX1QGp5zg==:117
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
X-XS4ALL-Spam-Score: -0.0 () SPF_HELO_PASS
X-XS4ALL-Spam: NO
Envelope-To: vernooi1@xxxxxxxxx
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mxdrop150.xs4all.nl
id p6ICBbGm053346
X-Evolution-Source: imap://vernooi1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:993/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 7/14/2011 8:56 AM, Bastian wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> the tes fails without the change. I've now pushed a proper news entry.
>
> Bastian
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Martin Pool <martinpool@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Thanks for the patch.
>>
>> That looks plausible to me, though I'd like a second review.
>>
>> Does this test fail without the change to sets applied?
>>
>> There ought to be a news entry saying the bug was fixed.
>>
>> --
>> https://code.launchpad.net/~baztian/bzr/809901-filter/+merge/67845
>> You are the owner of lp:~baztian/bzr/809901-filter.
>>
>
I'm a little concerned about the memory consumption of lots of sets. A
single set with more than 6 items in it becomes ~500 bytes.
I'm curious if it would be better to leave it as a list, and then just
put it into a set later before we iterate over it. (Then you only really
have 1 set at a time, rather than one for each path.)
We can always wait and see if this becomes a memory issue or not.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk4kIa0ACgkQJdeBCYSNAAPh0gCgj95XGZBTLb1HXD1kXkQQ7ywe
B68AoJ2FAFcfX9nQ0YFOu7wB6oWd4Ou/
=rj6S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~baztian/bzr/809901-filter/+merge/67845
You are reviewing the proposed merge of lp:~baztian/bzr/809901-filter into lp:bzr.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/812268/+subscriptions