desktop-packages team mailing list archive

[nukedathlonman <1129409@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Actually looking at my nVidia equipped system, the nVidia packages
installed on it, and my AMD system and the AMD packages installed on it
right now... Thinking about it, shouldn't the AMD driver depend on ocl-
icd-libopencl1 package?  Should the AMD pacakge be broken up into
seperate packages like the nVidia one (which would enable quicker bug
and/or updates to portions of it and such).  Just food for thought.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409

Title:
  Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide
  libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc.

Status in boinc package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fglrx-installer package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in fglrx-installer-updates package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-cuda-toolkit package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-304-updates package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-310-updates package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-313-updates package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-319 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-319-updates package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in pycuda package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in pyopencl package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in starpu-contrib package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in viennacl package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in boinc source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in fglrx-installer source package in Trusty:
  Confirmed
Status in fglrx-installer-updates source package in Trusty:
  Confirmed
Status in nvidia-cuda-toolkit source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-304-updates source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-310-updates source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-313-updates source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-319 source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-319-updates source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in pycuda source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in pyopencl source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in starpu-contrib source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in viennacl source package in Trusty:
  Invalid
Status in boinc source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in fglrx-installer source package in Utopic:
  Confirmed
Status in fglrx-installer-updates source package in Utopic:
  Confirmed
Status in nvidia-cuda-toolkit source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-304-updates source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-310-updates source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-313-updates source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-319 source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-319-updates source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in pycuda source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in pyopencl source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in starpu-contrib source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in viennacl source package in Utopic:
  Invalid
Status in nvidia-cuda-toolkit package in Debian:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The nvidia-cuda-toolkit package needs to depend on a minimum version of the CUDA library included in nvidia-graphics-drivers.
  The current Debian version of nvidia-cuda-toolkit (5.0.35-4) does this on Debian systems by checking the version of libcuda1 and on Ubuntu systems by checking the version of nvidia-current, nvidia-curent-updates, nvidia-experimental-304 or nvidia-experimental-310.

  It would greatly simplify maintenance of packages building against
  libcuda.so.1 and libOpenCL.so.1 if the nvidia-graphics drivers could
  provide virtual packages that reflect the API level, for example,
  libcuda-5.0-1 and libopencl-1.2-1.

  It was decided that the nvidia drivers packages will provide libcuda-5.0-1, libopencl1 and opencl-icd (LP: #763457) virtual packages. Additionally, nvidia-*.shlibs would contain:
  libOpenCL  1 libopencl1
  libcuda    1 libcuda-5.0-1
  libGL 1 libgl1

  Similarly, the amd drivers package will provide libopencl1 and opencl-icd virtual packages, as well as an .shlibs containing:
  libOpenCL  1 libopencl1
  libGL 1 libgl1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1129409/+subscriptions