← Back to team overview

desktop-packages team mailing list archive

[Bug 1069218] Re: users.conf doesn't match users.c

 

Hello Mike, or anyone else affected,

Accepted lightdm into precise-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/1.2.3-0ubuntu2.7 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Tags removed: verification-failed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069218

Title:
  users.conf doesn't match users.c

Status in Light Display Manager:
  Fix Released
Status in Light Display Manager 1.10 series:
  Fix Released
Status in Light Display Manager 1.2 series:
  Fix Released
Status in Light Display Manager 1.8 series:
  Fix Committed
Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in lightdm source package in Precise:
  Fix Committed
Status in lightdm source package in Trusty:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  The default users.conf provided by LightDM mentions a section [UserAccounts]. It should be [UserList].

  [Test Case]
  1. Check default installed users.conf
  Expected result:
  Should have a [UserList] section with all items available but disabled.
  Observed result:
  Have a [UserAccounts] section with all items available but disabled.

  [Regression Potential]
  Very low - just changing the default configuration file which has no active configuration items.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1069218/+subscriptions