desktop-packages team mailing list archive

[josefnpat <444282@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I can confirm this issue, but only when you scan `/`.

 When you scan `/home/<user>/` it works as one would expect.

It's hard to tell if this is "working as intended" since the
`/home/<user>/` option works, and the `/` scans as if the home folder
weren't mounted with encryptfs.

While it may confuse newer users, perhaps adding a prompt that says,
"Hey, I see you're using encryptfs. Want me to treat your filesystem the
way it is, or the way encryptyfs is trying to present it?" instead of
having this inconsistency may help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444282

Title:
  baobab should be aware of ecryptfs private directories

Status in gnome-utils package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: gnome-utils

  When using private directories, Baobab creates separate entries for
  the true filesystem (in ~/.Private) and the virtual filesystem (in
  ~/Private). The problem is more visible with a large ratio of files in
  private compared to out of it. At the least, one of these directories
  should be hidden.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-utils/+bug/444282/+subscriptions