desktop-packages team mailing list archive

[Adolfo Jayme <fitoschido@xxxxxxxxx>]

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=3f69547397e5841d0915921be5be8b3edfdfdbc5

** Changed in: df-libreoffice
   Importance: High => Undecided

** Changed in: df-libreoffice
       Status: Confirmed => New

** Changed in: df-libreoffice
 Remote watch: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #46440 => None

** Project changed: openoffice => hundredpapercuts

** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
       Status: Won't Fix => Triaged

** No longer affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: df-libreoffice
       Status: New => Fix Released

** No longer affects: hundredpapercuts

** Bug watch removed: OpenOffice.org Issue Tracker #64018
   http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64018

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to libreoffice in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251427

Title:
  [Upstream] python2.7 crashed with SIGSEGV in Application::IsInMain()

Status in LibreOffice Productivity Suite:
  Fix Released
Status in libreoffice package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: python-uno

  3) What is expected to happen via a terminal:

  cd ~/Desktop && wget
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/789891/+attachment/2146841/+files/test.py
  && python test.py

  is it does not segfault.

  4) It segfaults.

  Reproducible in Natty:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/789891

  Precise:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.7/+bug/938294

  Original Reporter Comments:
  lsb_release -d
      Description:    Ubuntu 8.04.1

  python-uno ersion: 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2

  The python script that causes this so small I can include it in line
  {{{
  #!/usr/bin/python
  import sys, uno, unohelper

  # get the uno component context from the PyUNO runtime
  ctx = uno.getComponentContext()
  smgr = ctx.ServiceManager
  xToolkit = smgr.createInstance( "com.sun.star.awt.Toolkit")
  unohelper.inspect(xToolkit, sys.stdout)
  }}}

  Saving this to a text file "test.py" and executing
      python test.py
  produces
      Segmentation fault

  I installed debugging symbols; here's the stack trace i got from gdb

  #0  0xb68b60c7 in Application::IsInMain () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libvcl680li.so
  #1  0xb6d9a2ba in VCLXToolkit_CreateInstance () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libtk680li.so
  #2  0xb7b14373 in cppu::OSingleFactoryHelper::createInstanceEveryTime () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3
  #3  0xb7b10180 in cppu::OSingleFactoryHelper::createInstanceWithContext () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3
  #4  0xb7b110e9 in cppu::OFactoryComponentHelper::createInstanceWithContext () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3
  #5  0xb7b13e18 in cppu::ORegistryFactoryHelper::createInstanceEveryTime () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3
  #6  0xb7b10180 in cppu::OSingleFactoryHelper::createInstanceWithContext () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3
  #7  0xb7b110e9 in cppu::OFactoryComponentHelper::createInstanceWithContext () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3
  #8  0xb76edbcd in stoc_smgr::OServiceManager::createInstanceWithContext () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/bootstrap.uno.so
  #9  0xb76e87d7 in stoc_smgr::OServiceManager::createInstance () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/bootstrap.uno.so
  #10 0xb7f3bae3 in callVirtualMethod () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libgcc3_uno.so
  #11 0xb7f3bdcf in cpp_call () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libgcc3_uno.so
  #12 0xb7f3c230 in bridges::cpp_uno::shared::unoInterfaceProxyDispatch () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libgcc3_uno.so
  #13 0xb6e85f3a in stoc_corefl::IdlInterfaceMethodImpl::invoke () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/reflection.uno.so
  #14 0xb6ed49cc in stoc_inv::Invocation_Impl::invoke () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/invocation.uno.so
  #15 0xb7bb526e in pyuno::PyUNO_callable_call () from /usr/lib/openoffice/program/libpyuno.so
  #16 0x0805cb37 in PyObject_Call ()
  #17 0x080c7987 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
  #18 0x080cb0d7 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
  #19 0x080cb227 in PyEval_EvalCode ()
  #20 0x080ea6d8 in PyRun_FileExFlags ()
  #21 0x080ea979 in PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags ()
  #22 0x08059335 in Py_Main ()
  #23 0x080587f2 in main ()

  {{{
  $ dpkg -l '*dbgsym*'
  Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
  | Status=Not/Installed/Config-f/Unpacked/Failed-cfg/Half-inst/t-aWait/T-pend
  |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
  ||/ Name                           Version                        Description
  +++-==============================-==============================-============================================================================
  ii  openoffice.org-base-core-dbgsy 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2               debug symbols for package openoffice.org-base-core
  ii  openoffice.org-core-dbgsym     1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2               debug symbols for package openoffice.org-core
  ii  openoffice.org-dev-dbgsym      1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2               debug symbols for package openoffice.org-dev
  ii  openoffice.org-headless-dbgsym 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2               debug symbols for package openoffice.org-headless
  ii  openoffice.org-impress-dbgsym  1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2               debug symbols for package openoffice.org-impress
  ii  openoffice.org-kde-dbgsym      1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2               debug symbols for package openoffice.org-kde
  ii  openoffice.org-ogltrans-dbgsym 1:2.4.1-1ubuntu2               debug symbols for package openoffice.org-ogltrans
  }}}

  What should have happened:
      A meaningful exception (or no exception), justifying python as a quick-test tool for ideas.

  What did happen:
     Whether I wanted to or not, a headlong dive into Ububtu / Debian package management.

  First I posted

      https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdevelop/+question/40081
      How do I step through the source code of	installed packages?
  (thanks for your responses)
  and realised that
  1. It's quite uncommon for people to debug / step through installed binary packages - the de-facto approach is to build from source with debugging information and optimisation off, and step through that.
  2. kdbg / gdb has no way of knowing (that I can find) where the source code for a loaded library / program is, even with the debug info package for that package installed.
  3. sudo apt-get source <packagename> doesn't apply to OpenOffice.org - I got the following message when I tried:
      $ apt-get -s source openoffice.org-core
      NOTICE: 'openoffice.org' packaging is maintained in the 'Bzr' version control system at:
      http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openoffice-pkgs/openoffice/2.4.1-hardy
      Please use:
      bzr get http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openoffice-pkgs/openoffice/2.4.1-hardy
      to retrieve the latest (possible unreleased) updates to the package.
  4. According to the apt-get man page, in the "source" command section:
  "Note that source packages are not tracked like binary packages, they exist only in the current directory and are similar to downloading source tar balls.".
  5. <trawls the net some more> I found
      http://openoffice.debian.net/build.html
      Building OpenOffice.org 2.2.1 from the latest apt-gettable Debian sources
  It suggested that I
      apt-get update
      apt-get build-dep openoffice.org
      apt-get source openoffice.org
  (which doesn't apply to Ubuntu, I guess)
  In Ubuntu, OpenOffice.org is stored on Bazaar
  6. OpenOffice.org is stored on Bazaar in 'bzip2 compressed archives' so I couldn't just point gdb at the expanded source tree.
  sudo apt-get install bzr
  bzr get http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~openoffice-pkgs/openoffice/2.4.1-hardy
  for which I would need about 6GB of free disk space and (from previous experience).
      dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot
  7. dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot failed as I needed to
  sudo apt-get install bison flex-old libpam0g-dev libxaw7-dev libfontconfig1-dev zlib1g-dev libfreetype6-dev libx11-dev libsm-dev libxt-dev libxext-dev libxtst-dev libice-dev libsane-dev libxrender-dev libcupsys2-dev libarchive-zip-perl libpng12-dev libjpeg62-dev libxml2-dev libldap2-dev libexpat1-dev libgnomevfs2-dev fastjar imagemagick netpbm libxkbfile-dev libxinerama-dev x11proto-render-dev unixodbc-dev gperf libpq-dev libxrandr-dev translate-toolkit libgl1-mesa-dev libglu1-mesa-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev libssl-dev libdb4.6-dev java-gcj-compat-dev libgcj-bc libxalan2-java libjcommon-java libsac-java libxml-java libflute-1.3-jfree-java libpentaho-reporting-flow-engine-java liblayout-java libloader-java libformula-java librepository-java libfonts-java libjcommon-serializer-java xulrunner-1.9-dev dmake mono-mcs mono-gmcs libmono-dev mono-utils cli-common-dev mono-1.0-devel mono-2.0-devel libhunspell-dev libboost-dev libvigraimpex-dev libwpd8-dev libwps-dev libwpg-dev libicu-dev libxslt1-dev libcairo2-dev kdelibs4-dev libhsqldb-java bsh libdbus-glib-1-dev libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-dev libneon27-dev libgtk2.0-dev

  Actually dpkg-buildpackage included version constraints in brackets for the required packages. I won't repeat them here as I don't want to waste your time unnecessarily.
  From building it before on Fedora 8 this would take up most of the day on my puny 1GHz pentium III with only 512MB RAM.

  8. The recommended location for source files
      http://proton.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSRCSOURCECODE
      Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
  I found the section on
      /usr/src Source code (optional)
  I'm guessing that I need to install the source code here.

  Speaking of Fedora, kdbg integration is somewhat more integrated and will recommend
      debuginfo-install <package name>
  this downloads and installs debugging symbol information and the source code in a well known location.

  9. The debugging information in the debugging packages doesn't include
  source file and line number information.

  I eagerly look forward to a considered response.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/251427/+subscriptions