desktop-packages team mailing list archive

[Սահակ <272010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubufox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010

Title:
  Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin
  selection dialog)

Status in icedtea-gcjwebplugin package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in openjdk-6 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in sun-java5 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in sun-java6 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in totem package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubufox package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  To provide proper integration with ubufox,

  1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a
  link for their binary in

   /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/

  and touch all /usr/lib/firefox-3.*/.autoreg that exist in .postinst.

  2. All plugins should have a Description and Filename header added to
  the binary package control, like gnash:

  Xb-Npp-Description: The GNU SWF Player (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/)
  Xb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so

  --------

  When encountering a java plugin Firefox offers a confusing dialog:
  it gives two options:
  1. "GCJ Web Browser Plugin"
  2. "The GCJ Web Browser Plugin"

  the second options supposedly uses openjdk.

  No descriptions are given whatsoever.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icedtea-gcjwebplugin/+bug/272010/+subscriptions