desktop-packages team mailing list archive
-
desktop-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #142607
[Bug 740506]
(In reply to Andre Guerreiro from comment #76)
> Created attachment 118745 [details] [review]
> Incremental hashing + large file support
>
> With this patch I've implemented the incremental hashing plus the large file
> support.
>
> This is still untested with files larger than 2GB but is correct for all the
> regular test cases I gathered before.
Some minor suggestions:
* The naming of BLOCK_SIZE and block_len in hashSignedDataBlock seems
misleading to me, maybe CHUNK_SIZE and block_len?
* The method hashSignedDataBlock could probably be replaced by a static
function taking the stream and the handler? This should give the
compiler more optimization possibilities than if it is visible in other
translation units.
* I think the while loop within could become a for loop for better
readability with the case reduced to computing the number of bytes to
read instead of two separate calls to doGetChars and updateHash.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506
Title:
verify digital signatures
Status in Evince:
Confirmed
Status in Poppler:
Confirmed
Status in poppler package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
Binary package hint: evince
This is a feature request to verify digital signatures. I'm receiving more and more digitally signed PDF's and evince already acknowledges them with:
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by <signer>
Date: <time stamp>
Reason: <reason>
Location: <location>
but it would be great if Evince would be integrated into the distro's ca-certificate infrastructure to verify these signatures.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/740506/+subscriptions