desktop-packages team mailing list archive

[Adrian Johnson <ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #114)
> I'm not very convinced by the naming of 
>   GBool isInteger() { return type == objInt || type == objInt64; }
> what do you think of 
>   isIntOrInt64() ?

I prefer a single word instead of isXXXorYYY() but I can appreciate that
isInteger() could easily be confused with isInt(). I'll change it to
isIntOrInt64().

I'll also add a corresponding getIntOrInt64() and replace the
"xxx.isInt64() ? xxx.getInt64() : xxx.getInt()" expressions with a single getter.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to poppler in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740506

Title:
  verify digital signatures

Status in Evince:
  Confirmed
Status in Poppler:
  Confirmed
Status in poppler package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: evince

  This is a feature request to verify digital signatures.  I'm receiving more and more digitally signed PDF's and evince already acknowledges them with:
  Signature Not Verified
  Digitally signed by <signer>
  Date:  <time stamp>
  Reason: <reason>
  Location: <location>
  but it would be great if Evince would be integrated into the distro's ca-certificate infrastructure to verify these signatures.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/evince/+bug/740506/+subscriptions