desktop-packages team mailing list archive
-
desktop-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #49374
[Bug 109356] Re: the "CPU History" graph info is unclear
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 214695 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214695
As the time axis is present already, as mentioned in comment 2, and the
remaining issue is that the cpu usage from the resource tab is not
scaled based on the cpu frequency scaling, I am marking this bug as a
duplicate of bug #214695, the bug about the frequency scaling-related
issue.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 214695
wrong percentage with frequency scaling
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109356
Title:
the "CPU History" graph info is unclear
Status in The GNOME System Monitor:
New
Status in “gnome-system-monitor” package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor
Hi! This report is about System Monitor 2.18.1.1, running on Ubuntu
Feisty. It would be a nice fix for Gutsy.
Currently the CPU History graph in the System Monitor is a nice tool
for a quick estimate of the current CPU usage, but only for a very
rough estimate. The main problem is that the units are not very clear:
the time axis is not marked at all, so I can at most estimate how long
a spike took; the height is marked in percent -- but doesn't mention
exactly of what.
I'm using Ubuntu on a Centrino Duo laptop, which can change the
frequency of each processor according to several factors. (I'm not
sure if it can scale each core separately, though. The factors I know
are load and whether or not I'm plugged in, there may be some other
heuristics.)
All this means that xy % processor usage can mean very different
things in terms of how much work the computer is doing. At the very
least, the legend below the graph -- [color] CPU#: ##.# % -- should be
changed to something like [color] CPU#: ##.# % usage (at ## GHz) --
though this doesn't fix the graph. Maybe a different line (different
shade or dotted) could indicate the frequency of the processor.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/109356/+subscriptions