desktop-packages team mailing list archive
-
desktop-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #71933
[Bug 1027760] Re: utmp records do not have X display address in host field
Is this still going to be included in precise? It's not in 12.04.5
$ apt-cache policy lightdm
lightdm:
Installed: 1.2.3-0ubuntu2.5
Candidate: 1.2.3-0ubuntu2.5
Version table:
*** 1.2.3-0ubuntu2.5 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1.2.1-0ubuntu1 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages
$ lsb_release -d
Description: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
$ w
18:31:49 up 3 days, 9:01, 8 users, load average: 0.31, 0.39, 0.45
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
administ tty7 17:36 3days 1:02 0.40s /usr/bin/lxsession -s Lubuntu -e LXDE
The display missing from the host field is preventing me from shadowing the session with WinSwitch and currently it's not practical for me to update to 14.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1027760
Title:
utmp records do not have X display address in host field
Status in Light Display Manager:
Fix Released
Status in “lightdm” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in “lightdm” source package in Precise:
Triaged
Bug description:
Impact:
utmp records generated by LightDM do not have the X display address in the ut_host field.
Test Case:
- log into a desktop session
- run "w" and see if there is a display associated with the session
- should work with the update
Regression potential:
The utmp,wtmp records could be wrong
---
utmp records generated by LightDM do not have the X display address in the ut_host field. It is not documented that this field should be used in this way, but this is what GDM does.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1027760/+subscriptions