desktop-packages team mailing list archive

[Sebastien Bacher <seb128@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. The issue you are reporting is an upstream one and it
would be nice if somebody having it could send the bug to the developers
of the software by following the instructions at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Upstream/GNOME. If you have done so, please
tell us the number of the upstream bug (or the link), so we can add a
bugwatch that will inform us about its status. Thanks in advance.

** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Low

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299749

Title:
  E4defrag fails to restore parent directory timestamp after
  defragmenting a file in that directory

Status in “file-roller” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The effect of this bug is quite similar to the one the was reported
  via bug 1133663 ”Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-
  empty folders”. Directions to reproduce follow:

  1. Create a tar.bz2 archive of a directory containing a fragmented file. One such file might be the 64-bit debian download of google-chrome-stable.
  2. Extract that archive to a temporary location that is not on the same partition.
  3. Consume some time, a few minutes will do.
  4. E4defrag the partition.
  5. Observe that the directory timestamp indicates the time that the file was defragmented. The original timestamp was not restored.

  The --delay-directory-restore flag got the job done for Extract Here.
  Might there be something similar for e4defrag?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1299749/+subscriptions